Governing Board Meeting — September 09, 2025

Meeting Details

People and Organizations Mentioned

Persons

Organizations

Transcript

0:16 I can read it. I'll email it.
0:34 What are you doing?
0:57 I want to say hi.
1:19 I have it.
1:39 >> Good evening. I'd like to call the
1:41 meeting of the TUSD governing board to
1:43 order. Roll call, please.
1:47 >> Dr. Robbie,
1:48 >> here.
1:49 >> Miss Luna Rose,
1:50 >> here.
1:51 >> Miss Shaw,
1:53 >> Mr. Rometo,
1:54 >> here.
1:54 >> Miss Extramm
1:55 >> here.
1:57 Next, we'll move on to the land
1:59 acknowledgement statement and that is
2:01 going to be giving given to us by Emily
2:03 Calderon. She's a fifth grade stu
2:06 student at Ericson Elementary School.
2:08 Emily is an amazing student and a joy to
2:11 have at Ericson Elementary. Her love for
2:14 the violin, music, and spending time
2:16 with friends makes Emily truly special.
2:19 Today is Emily's birthday. Happy
2:21 birthday, Emily.
2:23 And we wish her a wonderful day filled
2:25 with laughter, fun, and appreciate her
2:27 time spent assisting us with reading the
2:29 land acknowledgement statement. So,
2:31 happy birthday, Emily. And whenever
2:33 you're ready, you can start the land
2:35 acknowledgement statement.
2:37 Thank you. On behalf of the governing
2:40 board of the Tucson Unified School
2:42 District, I Emily Codor acknowledge that
2:45 the schools, buildings, and facilities
2:47 of the Tucson Unified School District
2:50 reside on the ancestral homeland of the
2:52 Dono Nation and the federally recognized
2:55 tribal land, the Pasqua Yaki tribe.
2:58 >> Thank you.
3:01 [Applause]
3:06 Next is our pledge of allegiance and
3:09 that will be given to us by Magnus
3:11 Manson. He is a fourth grade student at
3:13 Hudllo Elementary School. Magnus is a
3:16 10-year-old fourth grader at Hudlo
3:18 Elementary. In his first year at Hudlo,
3:21 he has connected with many new friends
3:23 and teachers and is always looking
3:25 forward to each school day. In his free
3:28 time, he loves to make digital art and
3:30 animations that reflect his interests.
3:33 He also enjoys playing video games,
3:35 especially ones that allowed allow him
3:37 to build his own world and interact with
3:39 other players. He regularly writes
3:42 scripts for the worlds he builds, often
3:44 memorizing them and giving voices to the
3:46 characters he creates. In the last year,
3:49 he's also found his singing voice and
3:51 loves to sing along to his favorite
3:53 songs on repeat. He is working on
3:55 building up the courage to sing in front
3:57 of other people, but he believes he'll
4:00 get there soon. Magnus hopes all of his
4:03 passions will lead him to become an
4:05 animator or writer, which will allow him
4:07 to inspire others with his stories.
4:10 That's really great, Magnus.
4:13 Whenever you're ready, you can do the
4:14 pledge.
4:22 I pledge al
4:24 pledge allegiance to the flag of the
4:28 United States of America and to the
4:31 republic for which it stands. One nation
4:36 under God, indivisible, with liberty and
4:40 justice for all.
4:42 >> Thank you so much.
4:44 >> You're welcome.
4:50 Uh, next is agenda adjustments. Dr. Chu,
4:57 >> the next round, members of the board, we
4:58 have no recommended agenda adjustments
5:00 uh, this evening.
5:02 >> Thank you. Next is the superintendence
5:04 report. Dr. Trio.
5:06 >> Yes. Uh, President Extra, members of the
5:08 governing board. Uh we begin tonight's
5:10 governing board meeting with just a hint
5:12 of sadness as we say goodbye to two
5:15 valuable members of the TUSD community.
5:19 Tonight we begin with a moment of
5:21 remembrance. The Anna Henry Elementary
5:23 School community honors and mourns the
5:25 life and legacy of their beloved school
5:28 counselor, Miss Cynthia Eman. She passed
5:30 away peacefully on May 22nd, 2025, the
5:34 final day of the school year. Miss
5:36 Simmon dedicated her career to serving
5:38 students and families and staff across
5:41 TUSD. Her previous roles included
5:44 serving as a counselor at McGee Middle
5:46 School and a classroom teacher at
5:48 Shoemaker Elementary. Over the years,
5:51 she touched countless lives with her
5:53 compassion, professionalism, and
5:55 unwavering support. Students fondly
5:58 remember her as a true friend, someone
6:00 who always listened, lifted their
6:02 spirits, brought joy and humor into
6:05 their day. Families describe her as a
6:07 deeply supportive, kind, and
6:10 instrumental in helping their children
6:12 thrive. Her colleagues at Henry are
6:15 especially grateful for her commitment
6:16 to the school's mission and the
6:18 well-being of every student. But
6:20 someone's strength, kindness, and
6:22 laughter will be profoundly missed. From
6:24 the bottom of our hearts, we thank her
6:26 for making our schools and our lives
6:29 better. I see our principal, Thomas
6:31 Heinger, is here this evening. I'd like
6:33 to invite him up to share just a few
6:35 words about what this incredible staff
6:37 member meant to the Henry community. Mr.
6:39 Heminger,
6:51 >> thank you.
6:57 Thank you, Dr. Trillo and the governing
6:58 board. Um, on behalf of our Anna Henry
7:01 community, Miss Eman, she was a true
7:05 educator. She has a very kind heart. She
7:08 was incredible with our students, very
7:11 generous,
7:13 always time to meet with children and
7:15 and discuss whatever was on their minds.
7:17 She was amazing with our families. Uh
7:20 just incredibly supportive of our our
7:22 school community and she will be deeply
7:25 missed. Thank you.
7:26 >> Thank you, Mr. Amager.
7:31 >> We also pause to honor another beloved
7:34 member of our TUSD family, a legend of
7:37 Badger Nation, Coach Oscar Romero,
7:40 longtime educator and coach at Tucson
7:43 High School. He passed away recently at
7:45 the age of 65 after a courageous battle
7:47 with liver cancer. He was a proud alumni
7:50 of Tucson High Badger through and
7:52 through. Coach Romero known
7:55 affectionately as coach O. Spent more
7:57 than three decades serving students as
8:00 both a teacher and a coach. From 1990 to
8:04 2018, he led the Badgers baseball
8:06 program to 488
8:09 wins and three state title game
8:11 appearances, as well as numerous trips
8:14 to the playoffs. After retiring from
8:16 Tucson High in 2018, he continued
8:19 mentoring student athletes at the
8:20 college level, most recently at Puma
8:23 Community College. Coach Griddle leaves
8:25 behind a legacy of excellence,
8:27 mentorship, and devotion. His passion
8:30 for teaching and learning and coaching
8:32 and shaping young lives will never be
8:34 forgotten and will leave a lasting
8:36 imprint and legacy in Badger Nation. We
8:39 extend our deepest condolences to the
8:41 Romero and the Eman families and we
8:43 thank them both for sharing their
8:44 extraordinary loved ones with the TUSD
8:47 community. I can share with you that one
8:50 of my most memorable um uh experience
8:54 here in Tucson Unified and one of my
8:55 earliest as a freshly minted
8:57 superintendent in 2017 was that spring
9:00 throwing out a first pitch in um in one
9:04 of the home games and coach Rometo's
9:06 final season. And I'll always remember
9:08 uh shaking hands with him out there on
9:09 the diamond, him giving me a big hug and
9:12 talking to me about his Badger beloved
9:13 Badger baseball team and uh everything
9:16 that uh they accomplished together. So
9:18 he will be sorely missed. He's
9:20 definitely an icon in the community. Uh
9:23 so please uh help uh all of us uh let us
9:26 honor both of these wonderful family
9:28 members and TUSD educators through a
9:30 moment of silence now. Thank you.
9:43 Thank you.
9:50 Uh last week I had the opportunity to
9:52 attend with several of our team members
9:54 the Arizona attendance conference. I'm
9:56 glad to see that there is momentum
9:58 building with some of the state's
9:59 largest districts, elementary, high
10:02 school, and unified in tackling the
10:04 issue of truency and absenteeism in
10:08 classrooms across the state. It was an
10:10 insightful summit. uh we got to learn a
10:12 lot from different districts in terms of
10:14 what they're doing to tackle the issues
10:16 of absenteeism and truency across grade
10:19 levels. So we're looking forward to
10:21 implementing some of the strategies here
10:23 in our own district as we wage a very
10:25 very important campaign to make sure
10:27 that everything every single child and
10:29 young person comes to school each and
10:32 every single day. This event emphasized
10:34 collaborative and data driven datadriven
10:36 strategies to improve overall student
10:38 attendance, reduce chronic absenteeism
10:41 to establish critical areas of focus
10:44 with regard to truency and absenteeism
10:46 and to build effective strategies around
10:48 those focus areas. So, we're certainly
10:51 looking forward um to building some of
10:53 those structures in our efforts here to
10:55 make sure everybody's in school every
10:57 single day. Uh last week I had an
10:59 opportunity to meet uh three wonderful
11:02 principles and experience the vitality
11:05 of three amazing school communities. Uh
11:07 starting with Valencia Middle School. I
11:09 want to stop I want to thank Omar
11:10 Sautello and his team for hosting me.
11:13 Had a wonderful visit out there uh in
11:16 and out of some of the art classrooms.
11:18 had a wonderful, very, very insightful
11:20 focus group with some very passionate
11:22 Valencia employees um who talked very
11:26 candidly about some of the celebrations
11:28 and some of the challenges uh out there
11:30 at Valencia Middle School. So, I want to
11:32 thank those staff members from taking
11:34 the time out of their day uh to talk to
11:36 me and want to wish Principal Sautello
11:38 all the best. They're off to an
11:39 absolutely great start out there at
11:41 Valencia. Uh I had an opportunity to
11:44 visit Badger Nation. I want to thank
11:45 principal John Lansa uh for hosting me
11:48 out there at Tucson High. Um and I also
11:51 want to thank Mariachi Aros for the
11:53 impromptu performance. Justin Enriquez
11:56 uh we we had no intentions of
11:57 interrupting the class. They actually
11:59 were engaged in a practice but true to
12:00 form once they saw us walk in. They
12:03 broke out into song and we had an
12:04 amazing performance uh from uh to from
12:07 uh uh Mariachi Rayos out there at Tucson
12:09 High. Also want to thank uh Julia
12:12 Martinez who's the new theater arts
12:14 teacher uh who is establishing his
12:17 presence there in the theater arts
12:19 program stepping in for longtime theater
12:21 arts director uh Mr. Art very impressed
12:25 uh with the classes. I also thank all of
12:28 our CTE programs that we visited there
12:31 that day and Mr. Lansa for a wonderful
12:32 visit. And last, we rounded out uh the
12:35 week with a visit to Mansfeld Middle
12:37 School, checking in on our brand new
12:39 principal, Carla Martinez, who's off to
12:41 a very, very good start there. Very,
12:43 very impressed uh with all of uh our
12:47 wonderful teachers that I was able to
12:48 visit. But most of all, just very very
12:52 impressed with our student focus group
12:54 that engaged me in some very very timely
12:57 talk topics and really spoke to me very
13:00 frankly about the prevalence of vape and
13:02 vaping materials and tobacco in the
13:05 community and the problems that it
13:07 presents uh in school. So, it's been a
13:10 while since uh I've had middle school
13:12 students that articulate and that frank
13:14 uh in terms of an issue. So, I want to
13:16 thank them for participating in that
13:18 conversation. In all three schools, I
13:21 will have the governing board note. I
13:23 was very impressed with the absence of
13:26 cell phones everywhere. It is really
13:29 having an impact. Um, that state law
13:31 that Governor Hobbs signed at PBLO High
13:34 School, I did not see a cell phone out.
13:36 We visited several classrooms. Uh I was
13:39 very very impressed about how our
13:41 students are really embracing the new
13:43 cell phone free expectations and
13:45 instructional spaces. So thought I'd
13:47 pass that along to our board. Uh this
13:49 Friday, September 12th, marks AVID day
13:51 and our Tucson Unified School District
13:53 AVID schools will join the nationwide
13:56 celebration of AVID's programmatic
13:58 impact on college and career readiness.
14:01 AVID day recognizes both the educators
14:03 who help close opportunity gaps and the
14:06 students who rise to the challenge.
14:08 Tucson Unified has seen strong outcomes
14:10 thanks to the dedication of our AVID
14:12 community. Over the past 5 years, TUSD
14:14 AVID students have graduated at rates
14:16 averaging 15% higher than the district
14:20 average. In the last academic year,
14:22 FAFSA completion, that's the free
14:23 application for student aid by Tucson
14:26 Unified AVID seniors, was 50% higher
14:29 than the Arizona state average. AVID
14:32 enrollment continues to reflect the full
14:34 diversity of our student body. Advancing
14:36 AVID's mission to ensure that every
14:38 student is prepared for success. We look
14:41 forward to celebrating these
14:42 achievements across our schools this
14:44 week and sharing some highlights at next
14:48 week's meeting. And now, as I conclude
14:50 the report, the best part of tonight's
14:52 report, we get to take a look at one of
14:55 the most amazing career and technical
14:57 education programs that we offer in our
14:59 high schools, the automotive technology
15:01 program from Sawarro High School. We're
15:05 excited to spotlight student achievement
15:06 through the lens of CTE. And this
15:10 evening, students from Sarro's
15:12 automotive technology uh program will
15:15 present their work. presentation will
15:17 include an interactive component and
15:19 participation by the governing board
15:22 offering a hands-on look at the skills
15:24 and realworld applications our students
15:27 are mastering. We're proud to have our
15:30 principal Mr. uh Roberto or as he is
15:32 affectionately known Bobby Estraa here.
15:35 I'd like to invite Mr.
15:36 to come on up and talk a little bit
15:38 about what the automotive technology
15:40 program means for the students at Saro
15:43 High School and the absolutely amazing
15:45 work and leadership of its lead
15:47 instructure. Mr. Estraa,
15:52 >> good evening. Uh thank you for inviting
15:54 us to be here today. We're very excited
15:55 to to uh to share our students with you
15:58 today and what they're learning.
15:59 Obviously, CTE and any kind of uh job
16:02 technician field to get people ready for
16:05 for the job force is important. You're
16:07 going to see tonight some of our best on
16:09 our campus. They're very bright. They're
16:11 really bright and and uh very highly
16:13 motivate what they do. They absolutely
16:14 love this program and they're being led
16:16 by a teacher that really prepares them
16:18 for the field. So, without further ado,
16:20 I'd like to introduce you to Mr. Brooks.
16:36 Well, good evening. Uh, my name is
16:37 William Brooks. I'm the automotive
16:39 technology instructor at Sorro High
16:40 School. I just want to say thank you to
16:42 Dr. Trio for inviting us here this
16:44 afternoon evening. Uh, we're really
16:46 excited to show you guys um what we're
16:49 gonna uh demonstrate for you for the
16:51 board.
16:55 Let me get my clicker out here. I do
16:57 notice that uh Miss Shaw is not here. So
17:01 often in life, you don't uh get the
17:03 opportunity to um put your boss on the
17:06 spot. So I'm going to ask Mr. Estraa to
17:09 >> step in as Miss Sha.
17:15 Uh you'll see her name on the other
17:17 side.
17:18 So, the automotive technology program is
17:20 a three-year program where students
17:23 learn about science and practical
17:24 applications of automotive principles.
17:26 Students can leverage this knowledge to
17:28 earn industry certifications like ASC
17:30 certifications in up to 10 different
17:32 specialties.
17:36 Those certifications and learned skills
17:38 can lead to professional outcomes with
17:40 jobs or internships in automotive and
17:42 related industries like transportation
17:43 and aviation.
17:45 In the automotive industry alone, there
17:47 are roughly 1,600 job openings in
17:50 Arizona every year.
17:54 So, specifically at SOR, we've been
17:56 really working on student outcomes
17:58 retention. Um, and we've seen almost a
18:01 400% increase in program retention over
18:03 the past few years, which has led us to
18:05 a lot of new measurable student success
18:07 achievements. Um, in 2024-25 alone,
18:12 um, we had our our students outperform
18:13 the state average in eight out of nine
18:15 categories in state testing.
18:17 Last year, we had 100% graduation rate
18:20 of our seniors in the program. So, not
18:22 one single senior who finished the
18:23 automotive program didn't receive a high
18:25 school diploma.
18:27 45% of those seniors left in a related
18:30 job the day they graduated or in a
18:33 educational program that was an
18:34 automotive related field.
18:38 And then 100% of our students at all
18:40 levels who completed at least one year
18:42 in our program left with a professional
18:44 certification of some kind that prepared
18:46 them for work.
18:49 So today we're going to demonstrate one
18:51 of the uh the core principles of modern
18:54 vehicles which is 12vt circuit building.
18:56 Um we're going to have our students
18:58 present to the board Dr. Trio and and
19:00 now Mr. Estraa. Um, so we've got Mattie
19:04 Bastine, a senior. We've got Theo Boyd,
19:08 a junior, who's also the president of
19:09 our automotive CTSO. Uh, Guy Breeden, a
19:12 junior. Paige O'Brien, a senior. Clark
19:16 White, a sophomore, and Braden N.
19:18 Ericson, a junior. Let's go ahead and
19:20 give them a round of applause.
19:28 So, we're going to go ahead and turn
19:29 this over to Clark, and the students
19:31 will guide you through this a little
19:33 bit.
19:35 Oh, thank you for asking us to present
19:37 to you. Today, we will demonstrate how
19:39 to build and measure simple 12volt
19:41 circuits that replicate many of the
19:43 onboard functions found in modern
19:44 automobiles. These circuits are
19:46 fundamental to every vehicle on the road
19:48 in the United States, from traditional
19:49 gas and diesel models to hybrids and the
19:51 most advanced electric cars.
19:56 Can the board members of Can the members
19:58 of the board and Dr. Trujillo join us
20:01 please?
20:14 do. So, we have a few important rules.
20:18 Make sure your safety glasses are on to
20:20 protect your eyes. When we are
20:22 manipulating the circuit pathways,
20:24 ensure the power source is switched off.
20:26 And be sure that there are no loose or
20:28 incorrectly placed wires when the
20:30 circuit is energized.
20:33 >> 12vt circuits control all the
20:35 accessories of your vehicle, including
20:36 door locks, your car stereo, and like in
20:38 today's example, lighting.
20:44 Components of a 12volt circuit consist
20:47 of wires, connectors, relays, switches,
20:50 power sources, and bulbs.
20:54 >> Uh, now the board members and Dr.
20:57 Trujillo will assemble the circuit and
20:59 eliminate the bulbs.
21:02 >> And and there is one more part to this.
21:03 So the board member or Dr. Trijo,
21:06 whoever gets it done first, Mr. Stra,
21:08 you're eliminated. Sorry. you you'll
21:10 receive a uh Sorro t-shirt and you'll be
21:12 an honorary cougar for at least the day.
21:22 >> So, what the students are doing is
21:23 they're demonstrating how to build a
21:25 12volt circuit to illuminate a light
21:27 such as would be in your car when you
21:28 open the door or your map light. Um
21:32 they're completely disassembled, so
21:34 they're assembling the wires and then
21:35 they're also going to check for voltage.
21:37 Um, what they don't know is I have made
21:40 all of them have a surprise.
21:54 >> I like want to check on
22:16 Make sure
22:41 Looks like Mr. Romero is in the lead
22:42 currently.
23:00 >> The beeping that you're hearing is
23:01 they're checking for continuity. So,
23:03 they're checking to make sure there's a
23:04 pathway for electricity in certain areas
23:06 of the circuit because we don't have a
23:08 light bulb yet. So, we're trying to
23:10 figure out what's failed.
23:36 What do we do?
23:57 Oh, Miss Extram with the first light.
23:59 Congratulations.
24:03 >> And Mr. Romero with the second light.
24:28 and Miss Rose
24:32 >> second place.
24:35 >> Thank you.
25:02 We've got Dr. Shaw followed by Dr. Trio.
25:04 Good job.
25:05 >> Thank you everybody. Let's go ahead and
25:07 give them a hand.
25:16 [Music]
25:21 probably.
26:09 observation
26:47 Thank you guys. Thank you. Appcate.
26:59 It's great.
27:01 >> Whatever.
27:03 >> A
27:12 >> Should I put this on and make a reminder
27:14 all night that you guys
27:16 >> Go for it. Go for it.
27:18 Shove it in our face.
27:23 >> Yay. And it's like CTE, like little gear
27:26 and car.
27:30 [Music]
27:37 Excuse
27:52 me. I'm coughing into the mic. What the
27:54 heck?
28:08 President, that concludes the
28:09 superintendent's report.
28:11 >> Thank you so much.
28:13 >> That was a lot of fun.
28:14 >> Miss Extra, I just want to point out
28:17 >> you came in first. I came in second.
28:19 Haha.
28:23 >> I am. I am.
28:27 >> Mainly because I didn't come in first.
28:30 >> I'm competitive.
28:32 >> Yes. Very competitive.
28:34 Uh, next is call to the audience. I'll
28:37 turn that over to Dr. Shaw.
28:38 >> All right.
28:43 >> Members of the public may speak during
28:45 the call to the audience. The governing
28:47 board clerk shall be responsible for
28:49 recognizing speakers and for maintaining
28:51 order where it may be appropriate. Those
28:53 who speak in person or want to have
28:55 their comments read shall email or call
28:57 the board office or complete a request
29:00 to address the board form before the
29:02 meeting. Speakers who have not completed
29:04 a request form are not permitted to
29:06 address the board. The speaker must
29:08 state their full name and topic prior to
29:10 addressing the board. Speakers are
29:12 encouraged to be brief with a maximum
29:14 time of three minutes. While more than
29:16 one speaker may speak together in the
29:18 time allowed, speakers are reminded that
29:20 they are not allowed to speak more than
29:22 once and they may not transfer or
29:24 delegate their time to others. If there
29:26 are documents for the board, please give
29:28 them to the board office staff and they
29:30 will ensure each board member receives a
29:32 copy. Those attending the meeting and or
29:35 speaking before the board shall observe
29:36 rules of good conduct. Speakers shall
29:39 also refrain from inappropriate or
29:41 slanderous remarks. And because TUSD
29:44 serves students from preschool through
29:45 high school, speakers should be aware
29:47 there may be children present present
29:50 and listening. At the end of the call to
29:52 the audience, the governing board
29:54 president will ask if any board member
29:55 wishes to respond to criticism, wish to
29:58 ask staff to review a matter, or wish to
30:01 ask that a matter be put on a future
30:02 agenda. No more than two members may
30:05 address each topic. Contents of this
30:07 card are public information. We have two
30:10 called to the audience uh in person and
30:12 two to be read. We'll start by uh with
30:14 Rebecca Salom and then KW Laauo.
30:24 Hi,
30:26 I'm Rebecca Salomé and um I'm a
30:30 substitute teacher in TUSD.
30:33 Good evening to the members of the
30:35 board, to Dr. Trujillo and to Councelor
30:38 Ross and all of us here who care about
30:41 the quality of education in our
30:43 community. I've been substitute teaching
30:46 for nearly seven years and it's been a
30:49 thrill and a challenge and worth it. And
30:53 um I've been looking closely at the
30:55 elements of the override proposition on
30:58 the upcoming November ballot.
31:02 Like many others, I am well pleased with
31:04 the direction it's going in. But
31:06 tonight, I want to focus on the proposed
31:09 pay raise, especially as it affects the
31:12 district. um substitute teachers. We are
31:16 operating under the assumption that we
31:18 will be included in the pay increase
31:21 portion. But I want to bring a couple of
31:23 quick points to your attention. First,
31:26 as AD certified substitutes, we are
31:31 employed to temporarily replace an
31:34 absent teacher in the classroom. And
31:38 since we are employed directly by TUSD,
31:41 we do fall directly into that category
31:44 called all other employment groups that
31:47 is stated in the proposal. And second,
31:51 it's important for the board members to
31:52 realize that in 82 of the TUSD schools,
31:56 substitutes have not gotten a pay raise
31:59 since 2021.
32:02 Um, we know and we're certain that the
32:04 board agrees that the district wouldn't
32:06 be as excellent as it is without
32:08 substitutes. And there are over 800 of
32:11 us who are certified and committed to
32:14 the vital work of educating our young
32:16 people. And we're working hard to get
32:19 voter support for November. If this
32:22 proposition gets passed, it's going to
32:25 be a great victory for TUSD, which has
32:29 not been granted an override in, I
32:32 think, more than two decades.
32:34 And our purpose here tonight is to
32:36 remind you that it is both just and
32:40 visionary for the board to guarantee our
32:43 inclusion in the district-wide employee
32:46 pays raise. So, thank you for listening
32:50 to your dedicated substitute teachers.
32:54 [Music]
32:57 Next, we have KW Laauo.
33:06 >> Good evening board members. My name is
33:08 KW Laauo and I am here to speak on
33:11 behalf of the substitutes
33:14 uh TEA. Uh so uh I have been a
33:18 substitute. This is my third year going
33:20 into it. I have worked in both full-time
33:23 capacities and in part-time capacities
33:25 and I am also a team of the bargaining
33:30 constituency with the
33:33 ad uh with tea and during our
33:36 negotiations we have run into a couple
33:38 of hiccups with the admin team and I am
33:42 here to ask some questions or to
33:47 um convince you to apply some pressure
33:50 uh Their delays have created
33:54 such structures in which we as
33:57 substitutes can be
34:00 dissuaded from the fight as we have
34:03 rarely or don't hear too much responses
34:06 when we have asked some questions, have
34:08 asked them for timeliness in terms of
34:11 setting up appointments, setting up
34:13 meetings. And when we do have meetings,
34:16 it is oftent times within a 30 or 90
34:19 minute time frame. As a group who is
34:22 starting a completely new contract to
34:24 only be given 90 minutes every month and
34:27 with that with very little response and
34:30 movement in setting those meetings when
34:32 it feels a little disrespectful to our
34:34 trade as substitute teachers who fill up
34:37 quite a lot of time. There's over 800 of
34:41 us as um Rebecca has stated and our
34:46 presence I believe is important for the
34:48 quality of students for the quality of
34:50 teachers livelihoods and also for
34:53 ourselves. Some of the things that we
34:55 would ask the district or to the
34:58 district to commit on is
35:01 uh if the district would be able to
35:04 commit to a schedule in meeting us in
35:06 giving us our due time in sharing our
35:08 grievances in working collaboratively to
35:11 have processes that would both make the
35:14 functioning of substitutes better for
35:15 the school district and ourselves.
35:18 The second thing I have to ask of y'all
35:20 is are if there are certain barriers
35:23 that make it hard for the admin team to
35:26 meet with us and if so what those
35:27 barriers are for us to be aware and how
35:29 to work with them. Our last thing that I
35:32 would like to talk about is here are the
35:34 certain issues that we have been
35:35 discussing that have been long overdue
35:37 and having a solution for some of the
35:40 things that we are wanting to talk about
35:41 and resolve within our bargaining with
35:44 the T with the admin is things like due
35:47 process um issues about our pay raises
35:50 as we haven't gotten one in the last 5
35:52 years as other groups have. And the last
35:55 thing that I would like to talk quickly
35:57 about is that there's lack of clarity on
35:59 how we can receive benefits such as
36:01 health care and retirement. These things
36:04 are important to keep the retention of
36:05 substitutes both long-term and short
36:08 term. Thank you for your time.
36:15 Thank you everyone uh in person for
36:17 speaking. We're going to turn to our
36:18 comments to be read. The first one is
36:20 from Tara Radliff. to be read. Data
36:23 sharing item 5.5. Clerk of the board and
36:26 board members, I urge each and one of
36:28 you to vote no on consent item 5.5. With
36:31 the proposed modifications to the PCHDA,
36:35 you will be effectively taking away
36:37 parental notification and consent for
36:39 the health-based issued for health-based
36:42 issued of school children. Please leave
36:44 parenting to the parents and education
36:46 to the school district. Have you
36:48 properly notified all affected parent
36:49 all affected parents and guardians of
36:51 this attempt to take away their
36:52 notification and consent rights? If you
36:55 had, you will see an outpouring of
36:56 outrage. Again, please vote no on
36:58 consent item 5.5 there. Thank you, Tara
37:01 Radliff. And next, we have
37:05 uh Henry Schneiker to be read. Consent
37:07 item 5.5.
37:09 TUSD board members, vote no on consent
37:11 item 5.5, Puma County Department of
37:14 Health Intergovernmental A uh agreement
37:16 amendment. The issue here is not The
37:20 issue here is that only an arbitrary
37:22 declaration protects the privacy of a
37:24 student's information. We only have to
37:26 look at recent history to see the
37:28 arbitrary, capricious and politically
37:30 motivated nature of declarations. 34 CFR
37:34 99.36
37:36 is so filled with weasel words and
37:39 phrases as to only offer this line the
37:41 slimmest protection easily sidestepped
37:44 with a declaration. Declarations are
37:47 typically made under the pretense of an
37:49 emergency following a quick fear
37:50 campaign. Terrorized people are easier
37:53 easier to fool and manipulate. Thanks
37:55 Henry Schniker parent. And uh Madam
37:58 President that concludes the call to the
38:00 audience.
38:01 >> Thank you Dr. Sha would any member of
38:03 the governing board like to address any
38:06 comments made during call to the
38:08 audience?
38:11 >> Great. We'll move on. Next is consent
38:14 agenda. Um
38:16 items 5.2 through 5.9. Dr. Truhe.
38:20 >> Yeah. President Extro, governing board
38:22 members, the administration recommends
38:24 um that the board uh approve uh consent
38:27 agenda items as arranged 5.2 to 5.9.
38:32 Dr. or I mean Mr. Romero.
38:34 >> Yeah. I'd like to have discussion on 54
38:36 and 55 before we vote on those.
38:40 >> Please.
38:41 >> Do you Okay. So then um do I hear a
38:43 motion to approve 5.2, 5.3, 5.6, 7, 8,
38:47 and nine.
38:48 >> So moved.
38:48 >> Second.
38:49 >> The item has been moved and seconded. Um
38:52 all those in favor say I.
38:53 >> I. Those opposed? Motion carries. Item
38:57 5.4 4 is the approval of the
38:59 intergovernmental agreement between TU
39:01 TUSD and the city of Tucson for TUSD to
39:05 be a subreient of the city of Tucson
39:07 composting and food waste reduction
39:09 project.
39:10 Dr. Tru.
39:12 >> Yes. Um for item 5.4 um I would like to
39:15 welcome uh up our um director for food
39:18 services Lindseay Aguilar to address any
39:21 questions uh related to the IG. And then
39:24 on deck we have Dr. GA uh who will be
39:26 able to address uh any questions or
39:29 details on the IGA with the Puma County
39:31 Health Department.
39:34 >> Good evening. Questions? Mr. Romero?
39:37 >> Yes. Um so a couple things on the first
39:39 chart that we talked about, you know, on
39:42 the agenda 5.4 talks about year one
39:45 contractual inind total. Um you know,
39:48 and then looking at the subreient
39:50 agreement, you know, and it talks about
39:52 some of the different numbers in here.
39:54 First of all, what is
39:57 inind reference to here under both year
40:00 one and two?
40:01 >> Yeah. So that in kind for this grant,
40:04 it's USDA grant through the city of
40:06 Tucson. Um so we already have a project
40:09 specialist that is hired on through tsd
40:12 food services that's currently doing
40:13 this work in our schools. So that inind
40:16 contribution is that $12,000 is part of
40:20 the salary that we're already um covered
40:22 out of the food service budget. Um that
40:24 is a requirement for the grant that
40:26 there's an inind contribution. So we're
40:29 using um the funds that we're already
40:31 expending under normal circumstances
40:34 that supports this grant work.
40:36 >> Okay. So then under the contractual
40:39 infringe benefit, so this is a new
40:42 position then. Is that correct? Right.
40:45 So, this is supporting additional FTE
40:48 for that work. And so, we're actually
40:49 going to be receiving that funds through
40:51 this grant as a subreient.
40:54 Okay. So, I'm just trying to figure out
40:56 other than uh some type of, you know, I
41:00 guess understanding why we have this
41:03 even going back into subreient. So, the
41:05 city of Tucson looks like they're
41:07 getting a grant awarded of the amount of
41:10 $368,353
41:13 under this grant. And in that, the
41:17 subreient, which is us, we get the uh
41:21 amount not to exceed uh 66,19860.
41:27 So, what is the city doing with this
41:29 extra $32,000ish
41:33 dollars um of this money? And we're just
41:37 getting a small portion of this. And I
41:41 don't know, it looks like we're doing a
41:43 lot of this work over here. We're only
41:45 paying for one FTE for a small project.
41:51 >> Yeah. So, the the city of Tucson, this
41:53 grant includes a much larger um
41:56 composting and food waste reduction work
41:58 throughout the city. Um the components
42:00 of the grant that are listed in this IG
42:03 are specific to what activities we're
42:05 doing at TUSD that aligns with our
42:07 climate action policy and expanding our
42:10 composting and food waste reduction
42:11 efforts. um this is a larger broader uh
42:15 citywide approach to composting and food
42:18 waste which is why they're receiving
42:20 such a large amount of money. This
42:22 segment is just the specifics to TUSD in
42:25 our partnership specific to our schools.
42:28 >> So what other are other school districts
42:31 being planned on participating in this?
42:34 Other businesses who else is involved in
42:36 this $300 and some thou,000?
42:40 >> Sure. Um I have our project spe special
42:42 specialist Susan Silverman who um is
42:45 coordinating uh this grant currently
42:47 that we have and then this extended
42:49 grant with the city of Tucson so she can
42:51 give a bit more insight into the details
42:53 of what the city's doing.
42:58 >> Hello. Thank you.
42:59 >> Nice to see you all. Um so the city of
43:02 Tucson is sponsoring this grant project
43:06 for composting and food waste reduction.
43:08 The last grant that we had that we're
43:09 just finishing out uh was sponsored by
43:12 TUSD. We were the sponsor of the grant.
43:15 Now, that grant uh we were not able to
43:18 renew it. It's a one-time grant, but
43:20 we're still able to partner with the
43:22 city. So, it will be a new initiative
43:24 involving schools that are not currently
43:27 composting just to pick up their food
43:30 waste from the city of Tucson that'll
43:31 send trucks around to the designated
43:34 schools to pay for that. So that's our
43:37 portion of the project. The other
43:38 partner in the project is Ishkashita
43:40 Refugee Network uh working with refugees
43:44 around the community to uh help reduce
43:47 food waste from the food that they're
43:49 collecting. So it'll be Ishkoshita, TUSD
43:52 and the city of Tucson expanding their
43:55 composting and food waste reduction
43:57 initiatives at Losalis landfill will be
44:00 the site that our food waste is going to
44:02 be going to and then in return will
44:05 receive compost and mulch from the city
44:07 which they've already started to do
44:09 which has been a really wonderful
44:11 partnership with the city of Tucson.
44:12 We're very thankful for their their uh
44:15 involvement in the project and for their
44:17 taking it up so that they could write
44:19 another grant and help us continue the
44:21 project.
44:22 >> So of the compost and mulch that they're
44:25 you know we initially help to produce
44:28 then are these coming back to all our
44:30 individual schools for their individual
44:32 gardens and things of that nature.
44:34 >> Exactly.
44:34 >> And who else benefits from this compuls
44:37 and mulching in this program? The
44:39 Community Gardens of Tucson is a
44:41 citywide group that been that partners
44:43 with the city um and o all the other
44:46 nonprofits and groups that work with the
44:48 city to receive that compost. I know
44:50 that they deliver to the city council
44:52 offices so community members are able to
44:55 go and pick up finished compost there
44:58 for their garden needs and often our
45:01 schools will benefit from that as well.
45:03 >> Okay. And it looks like this is a 2year
45:06 commitment. And you had mentioned before
45:08 we had an old grant where we were doing
45:10 that. Was that kind of where our inind
45:13 person came on in or was that something
45:15 different?
45:16 >> Yes, that's exactly it.
45:18 >> Okay.
45:18 >> The inkind portion came from my salary
45:20 actually and that is the vision for
45:23 moving forward and it's 0.25% of of my
45:27 salary right now.
45:28 >> Okay. So, as far as any money coming out
45:31 of TUSD to participate in this, because
45:35 I know looking at it, you know, our
45:37 amount was 66,198,
45:40 which is, you know, the contractual
45:43 number right over there, then are we
45:45 just um from TUSD then coming out taking
45:48 care of the 12,730
45:52 um um towards your position then? Is
45:55 that what I'm understanding?
45:57 >> Yes, that's correct.
45:58 >> Okay. the 66,000 pays for a compost
46:01 technical spe compost project specialist
46:04 that will we've got someone in place
46:06 right now and he's going to be able to
46:08 continue for the next two years in that
46:10 role supporting all of our composting at
46:12 the schools
46:13 >> and then just kind of reading through
46:15 all the different things you know all
46:17 the different regulations reporting
46:20 performance evaluation monitoring
46:23 cooperation etc etc etc etc audits
46:27 results independ and an audits. There's
46:29 a lot of things that go along with this.
46:31 Will whoever we have to fill that
46:34 position be able to do all of the
46:38 requirements um that are are required in
46:41 here with their normal positions or is
46:43 this also something food services is
46:46 going to be kind of overseeing to make
46:49 sure these things are done within our um
46:52 food services department? food services
46:54 will be overseeing it and the person in
46:57 that position right now is currently
46:59 assisting with all of the required
47:01 reporting and audits and everything
47:02 else.
47:03 >> Okay. And then as far as because it is
47:06 two years, if we find out it's not
47:09 working, I I don't remember seeing this.
47:12 Um what are our options if we needed to
47:14 get out of this agreement or this of
47:16 this grant?
47:18 Do we know?
47:20 >> I would offh hand I don't specifically
47:22 know. I'd have to confirm through the
47:24 agreement, but typically there is um an
47:26 opt out or some type of notification
47:29 that we could we could utilize that
47:31 would have to be approved by the USDA
47:33 grant because this was submitted as a
47:35 federal grant application um where the
47:37 city of Tucson identified all the
47:39 different partners that are going to be
47:40 subreients of this grant. Um but
47:42 typically in those grants there is some
47:44 type of disclosure if there were to be
47:47 um something. The idea though is this
47:49 additional funding is going to con allow
47:51 us to continue our efforts in increasing
47:54 the composting initiatives that we have
47:56 going on across the district.
47:57 >> So is that Oh go sorry.
47:59 >> No, that's okay. Um the the 60 um $6,000
48:02 like Susan stated is going to help
48:04 continue to pay for the positions that
48:06 we that we currently have doing this
48:08 work.
48:09 >> So then does it look as though that we
48:12 want to continue this in the future or
48:14 after that grant goes? Is it something
48:16 we try to carry on and continue to hold
48:19 this torch if the grant doesn't come
48:21 back on through? What's our long-term
48:23 vision or goals or ideas on this other
48:26 than our short term of getting compost
48:28 for our gardens and and for our our
48:31 school uh facilities? So, the long-term
48:34 goal is to utilize this grant with the
48:36 city of Tucson to help build that
48:38 infrastructure within the city um to
48:41 allow us for them to pick up the food
48:43 waste to then turn it into compost
48:46 because that's something that is a real
48:48 challenge with trying to collect food
48:50 wastes throughout the community that can
48:51 then be turned into something to benefit
48:54 gardens um and other environmental
48:56 efforts. So, that is the long-term goal
48:58 is that this will help create that
48:59 infrastructure throughout the city of
49:01 Tucson. And of course within TUSD.
49:04 >> And I know it's kind of hard to to
49:06 answer this question, but I'll ask just
49:08 I'm sure there's been meetings of like
49:10 said this other 302 uh,000. I know you
49:13 mentioned one organization that's also
49:16 going to be helping out and then some
49:18 city things. Are those those just the
49:22 three programs that are utilizing this
49:24 301 or you know 368,000
49:28 just those three organizations?
49:31 I know there's quite a bit more
49:33 partnerships that the city of Tucson
49:35 does have that are connected to this
49:37 work of trying to build that
49:38 infrastructure um with the food waste
49:40 collection and working with the Los
49:42 Riales landfill as well.
49:44 >> Okay. And I guess just as far as to make
49:47 sure that um it's beneficial to the
49:50 school, how is that going to get back to
49:53 the board to let us know how this grant
49:55 is working after our first year? Um so
49:58 we do quarterly reports and so we do
50:01 post that information on our food
50:03 service social media uh for our
50:05 composting project and that is something
50:07 that we also provide to the grant
50:10 requirements. So we uh for example weigh
50:12 the food waste that's being collected
50:14 across tsd and all of the contributions
50:16 that that's making to reduce uh food
50:19 waste. So it is something that is built
50:21 into the tracking um and data and these
50:24 the the grant also has that built in to
50:26 different partners that help analyze
50:29 that data so that we can report the
50:31 greater impact um in our community from
50:34 doing this.
50:35 >> Okay. And so then currently are we doing
50:37 then through uh food services the work
50:40 that you're doing here um before we came
50:43 into this grant. So do we have record of
50:45 what you know your department has done?
50:47 >> Yes. Because this again for me this is a
50:49 new part that I was not aware that we
50:51 had a inind you know aspect of this. So
50:54 I just want to make sure I understand
50:56 all the intricacies of this.
50:58 >> Yes, we definitely have that data.
51:00 >> Okay.
51:00 >> And happy to share.
51:01 >> Thank you.
51:02 >> Miss Dextter.
51:04 >> Yes, Miss Shaw.
51:05 >> Uh first I want to uh say good evening
51:08 and sorry I'm late. My daughter had a
51:10 volleyball game at McGee. Um I want to
51:13 thank Mr. Romero for his line of
51:15 questioning. It's great to hear more
51:16 about this. um agenda item and um you
51:20 know I've seen the big pile of mulch at
51:22 my local park at Dorsy Thompson Park. I
51:25 know there's one at the WI 3 office as
51:27 well. I haven't had the opportunity to
51:29 take a bucket yet and uh grow a garden,
51:32 but I'm very hopeful that I will one
51:34 day. Uh with that, do you know how much
51:37 uh pounds of compost that we generate
51:39 here from uh TUSD schools?
51:43 >> I don't know that offhand, but I can get
51:44 that for you. We do track that.
51:46 >> It's a significant amount, I assume.
51:48 >> Yes. And it's been like I this grant,
51:51 our current composting grant, we're in
51:53 our sec um second year of it. So, it's
51:55 it's been something that we've been
51:57 tracking for the last two years.
51:58 >> Okay, great. And that is Sorry, I don't
52:01 have board docs pulled up yet, but
52:03 that's at how many schools in TUSD?
52:08 This this last year we worked directly
52:10 with with 25 of our schools that have
52:13 school gardens with composting and
52:15 vermma composting. Um and I I forget the
52:18 exact amount but it's around 60,000
52:21 pounds of
52:22 >> okay
52:22 >> food waste that we've um composted. I do
52:25 want to um just interject that um
52:28 currently in the US we discard
52:32 approximately 40% of our food waste for
52:35 food that's produced. Right? So even any
52:38 impact that we can make on that um is
52:41 significant in terms of addressing
52:43 climate change and anything we can do.
52:45 So this really fits into our climate
52:47 action plan for TUSD and um we
52:51 appreciate the board's initiative in in
52:53 supporting that and feel that this fits
52:55 right into that.
52:57 >> Absolutely. Um is there capacity to have
53:00 this uh at every one of our schools?
53:05 That would be the ultimate goal that
53:07 we're building towards. Yes.
53:09 >> Great. Is there like a dollar amount
53:11 associated with that that you can just
53:14 like ballpark?
53:15 >> I don't have that, but I can tell you
53:17 with the work that we're doing with the
53:18 climate action policy um and the company
53:21 that we're working with that is part of
53:23 it. That's we'll have some more um
53:25 realistic figures in terms of what that
53:27 would entail and the staffing um support
53:30 for that.
53:30 >> All right. Thank you.
53:33 Um, I would just like to say I love
53:35 seeing the kids compost when I go to
53:37 different schools. So, I appreciate your
53:40 work in this and I will move the item.
53:42 >> I'll second.
53:43 >> The item has been moved by myself and
53:45 seconded by Dr. Shaw. All those in favor
53:47 say I.
53:48 >> I.
53:48 >> I. Those opposed. Motion carries. Item
53:52 5.5 is uh the approval to amend the
53:55 current IGA between to USD and Puma
53:58 County Health Department and establish a
54:00 data sharing agreement. Dr. Truhe
54:05 introduce our director for health
54:07 services uh Dr. Joseph Gau who will uh
54:09 be available to answer any questions
54:11 from our board.
54:13 >> Any questions for Dr. Gau? Mr. Romero.
54:17 >> Hi. Yeah, thank you. So, um just kind of
54:20 going over the um intergovernmental
54:24 agreement amendment. Um one of the
54:26 things I guess that just sticks out to
54:28 me which I I again hopefully can help
54:31 explain it says 2.5 on the second page
54:35 allowances of personal information
54:37 sharing secondary to health or safety
54:39 emergency without parental consent
54:41 consent. Um and it kind of goes into
54:44 some issues. One of the um things
54:46 mentioned was actually brought up at the
54:48 call to the audience. Um um but what you
54:52 know anything that says without parental
54:55 consent um get brings concern not just
54:58 to me but I know a lot of uh people
55:00 within our community. Can you explain
55:02 that um 2.5 to me please?
55:04 >> Sure. Absolutely. So when we have a
55:08 outbreak as it is determined through the
55:12 Puma County Health Department at that
55:15 particular point we need to track and
55:18 trace that process of exposure and
55:22 disease. So in the past and we've
55:25 learned this from the COVID experience
55:29 is that the the lack of ability to share
55:35 information particularly called a line
55:38 list is what is called in our district
55:42 is the students who are exposed and then
55:46 we basically share the contact uh data
55:52 uh so that the the county may ensure the
55:59 uh safety of the students and that they
56:01 get con or they get a
56:04 a
56:06 physician followup. So we're sharing
56:10 data specific to the outbreak uh per the
56:15 law. We're not
56:18 any other data that is shared is is
56:25 purely
56:27 in in uh in di
56:31 I
56:34 identified information. So it it's in
56:37 large number aggregate basically. So but
56:40 in this particular case it would be
56:43 example if we have a student who has
56:47 confirmed measles in a school we have to
56:50 act quickly to find all those particular
56:53 students who are and staff who is not
56:56 vaccinated accordingly get them out of
56:59 the school and then we we we have to
57:03 track all exposures as well. So that's
57:08 the
57:09 intent of that uh that ruling in there.
57:16 >> So I guess I didn't hear under that
57:18 though without parental consent.
57:21 >> Yes.
57:22 >> Why why is this done without parental
57:24 consent?
57:25 >> So we
57:28 when you're dealing with an outbreak, we
57:31 have time that is not on our side. So
57:35 what we do, what this
57:39 particular uh
57:41 step would allow us to do is to share
57:44 the actual line list without having to
57:47 contact every single parent on that
57:50 particular line list. And then basically
57:52 the county can
57:57 follow up with each of those individuals
58:02 from a
58:04 a
58:09 my apologies. My start has been really
58:11 bad today. So
58:12 >> you're good. from a
58:15 public health perspective for that
58:18 because they do have tools and and and
58:24 support services that we do not.
58:28 So the basically it's telling the county
58:32 this is
58:35 to the students who are who are ex who
58:39 have been confirmed as exposed and they
58:43 follow up with them.
58:47 >> Okay. So, I guess just even with that um
58:51 you know explanation
58:53 um you know just this wording in here uh
58:57 to to even have anything that mentions
59:00 that we take it out of TUSD's hands and
59:04 just gives it over to a government, you
59:07 know, a county government without
59:10 parental
59:12 knowledge of these types of things. um
59:15 is is very concerning to me that, you
59:18 know, we would we would even consider
59:20 doing something uh like that um to our
59:23 to our parents and and people that are
59:27 in charge of our students. I know for me
59:29 personally um well, as you can hear, I'm
59:32 talking about it right now, it it would
59:34 throw up a red flag um on that. Is Puma
59:39 County Health requesting this from all
59:42 the school districts? Do you know
59:45 >> that? So all I can speak for
59:49 is our district. So but I can tell you
59:54 with the current staffing model that
59:57 school health has with the current
1:00:00 full-time equivalent that we have in
1:00:02 school nurses, the contact tracing
1:00:06 requirements, the followup.
1:00:10 So one would need if there's an outbreak
1:00:13 that really puts a big strain on the
1:00:16 staffing
1:00:18 uh to to do all that work if we can't
1:00:22 share that data. So the alternative is
1:00:26 is we can continue to to support that
1:00:32 but we need more personnel who are
1:00:34 licensed in schools. Right now we have a
1:00:38 very uh
1:00:40 limited amount of staffing who are
1:00:43 licensed personnel that float between
1:00:46 multiple schools. So they may not even
1:00:49 be at that that school where the
1:00:52 outbreak is occurring. So we
1:00:56 not only so is this intended to increase
1:01:01 data sharing to get content experts who
1:01:04 are who who are capable of guiding us in
1:01:07 that particular event but it's also to
1:01:11 help reduce burden on that too because
1:01:14 during COVID we were tracking
1:01:17 contact
1:01:19 uh constantly but we did have support
1:01:23 staff
1:01:24 to help us in that process as well. And
1:01:28 since those funds have gone, there is no
1:01:31 uh so we're preandemic at this point.
1:01:36 So, so it looks like this actually just
1:01:38 might be an overview for a if another
1:01:43 situation similar to a COVID situation
1:01:46 happens where we don't have the staff to
1:01:48 take care of those things. Wouldn't it
1:01:50 be a better option to have something as
1:01:53 opposed to giving it to Puma County if
1:01:55 we don't have the proper staff to be
1:01:57 able to have something um within you
1:02:01 know uh our budget somewhere you know um
1:02:03 I'm sure there's something that Ricky
1:02:05 can find if we need to outsource
1:02:07 something to help us with these versus
1:02:11 handing over the keys to Puma County
1:02:14 whenever they feel that something comes
1:02:16 up and now we we basically give them the
1:02:20 rights of our parents to do that. I
1:02:22 think it would be more advantageous to
1:02:24 earn the trust of our parents um to say
1:02:27 if a situation happens again, we will at
1:02:30 that point outsource to get the amount
1:02:32 of people we need to help us within the
1:02:34 district and not bypass, you know, their
1:02:37 their consent. I didn't know if that's
1:02:40 another option that we've looked at or
1:02:42 not or if this is because it's all been
1:02:44 proposed and it's not been, you know,
1:02:46 looked at in a different way. So, it's
1:02:49 important to know that that we're not
1:02:50 giving the keys over to anybody. What
1:02:53 we're doing here is we're we're giving
1:02:56 information
1:02:58 to an approved public health government
1:03:01 agency that supports our county.
1:03:04 So, what that means is
1:03:08 I don't diagnose. My my nursing staff
1:03:12 does not diagnose. a health care
1:03:14 provider who is licensed to diagnose is
1:03:17 the ones who make those decisions. What
1:03:20 was happening in the past is we need
1:03:23 support from content experts that are
1:03:28 provider-based that can help guide the
1:03:31 next step to these particular things.
1:03:34 All this is saying is we're going to
1:03:37 share aggregate data so that we can
1:03:41 build better programs to support our
1:03:44 students and the Tucson
1:03:47 community at large which a school
1:03:50 district is the biggest public health
1:03:53 entity available to us. All right.
1:03:57 Number two, all this provides is when
1:04:01 there is a designated outbreak as per
1:04:04 the rule here, it's a public health
1:04:08 issue. All right? Then we share the the
1:04:12 line list that of the individuals who
1:04:15 are impacted so that we can connect them
1:04:18 with the services and help that is
1:04:20 needed for public safety and to stop the
1:04:23 outbreak. That's all this is saying.
1:04:27 Yeah. And and I appreciate that that
1:04:30 great explanation, you know. So I I do
1:04:32 appreciate that. I think the only thing
1:04:34 against my reservation is possibly the
1:04:37 language. The way that you've explained
1:04:38 it makes a lot more sense than as what
1:04:41 somebody else might take it in the
1:04:43 language over here. So Dr. G, thank you
1:04:45 very much for your explanation. I
1:04:47 appreciate it.
1:04:47 >> You're welcome.
1:04:48 >> Dr. Shaw,
1:04:48 >> I'll move the item.
1:04:50 >> I'll second.
1:04:50 >> Miss Shaw, uh Dr. G.
1:04:55 This reminds me of, you know, of course,
1:04:58 the COVID times and the issue that we
1:05:00 had when there were outbreaks at our
1:05:03 schools and the Puma County Health
1:05:05 Department was slow to react to the data
1:05:08 that we provided them and did not call
1:05:10 it an outbreak and we weren't able to
1:05:12 close down schools. Does this give all
1:05:16 the power to the health department to do
1:05:18 that?
1:05:20 So we are giving the power to the
1:05:23 content experts that are able to make
1:05:26 that determination.
1:05:29 >> But
1:05:30 certain school sites who know like we
1:05:33 have 40% of staff out. We have a huge
1:05:36 amount of students out and we have to
1:05:38 wait a week or two for the county health
1:05:40 department to react.
1:05:42 >> This is my concern.
1:05:44 So, I understand that concern, but my
1:05:49 health services department does not have
1:05:52 the ability to make those determinations
1:05:55 and we can't speak for
1:06:00 the
1:06:03 capabilities of the county, right? So
1:06:07 all we can do is build a system where we
1:06:11 can get the maximum partnership as we
1:06:14 possibly can. And this potentially could
1:06:19 open up other doors to maybe developing
1:06:23 a deeper partnership in a way where
1:06:26 where perhaps we get resources that are
1:06:30 are are created specifically for our
1:06:33 school district. Don't know how that
1:06:36 would look, but that opens a door to
1:06:39 that. But you can't go after
1:06:42 uh larger grants of that sort or or
1:06:48 some alternative funding sources if we
1:06:50 can't share data in that capacity.
1:06:54 >> Right. Yeah. I mean I'm okay with
1:06:57 sharing the nonidentifiable data and in
1:07:00 many ways also the identifying data if
1:07:02 needed. I'm just concerned that
1:07:06 when you have information between
1:07:09 different jurisdictions and there's an
1:07:12 emergency happening that it creates a
1:07:16 vacuum where we can't react as quickly
1:07:18 as we need to.
1:07:19 >> So I can perhaps offer you um a change
1:07:25 that has happened. So since the
1:07:28 pandemic, we have restructured health
1:07:32 services where we have a cabinet of
1:07:35 expert nurse leaders now who meet very
1:07:39 regularly and one of them is a a disease
1:07:43 nurse who works directly
1:07:48 between us and the county. So we're
1:07:50 talking all the time now. In the past,
1:07:52 that wasn't always the case, but our
1:07:56 partnership and and our relationship and
1:08:00 needs have really grown together. So, I
1:08:04 think it'll probably
1:08:07 it's probably a more positive experience
1:08:10 today than it has many years ago.
1:08:14 >> Right.
1:08:16 Okay. Um and then I notice well on
1:08:21 number 2.5 it says PCHD will make the
1:08:24 determination of outbreak under this
1:08:26 provision. Yes.
1:08:27 >> Uh but there's no definition of what
1:08:29 what an outbreak is. Is that because
1:08:31 it's case by case basis?
1:08:33 >> Yes. because um it's not only case by
1:08:38 case but it's also like uh it's
1:08:44 varied from one condition to another.
1:08:48 Right? So, one disease would have an
1:08:52 outbreak score of a of a of a certain
1:08:56 number or or uh or or
1:09:02 involvement
1:09:04 uh
1:09:06 a p
1:09:10 or a certain stated
1:09:17 stated percentage by the actual disease
1:09:21 factor. Others do not. So, it's
1:09:24 completely
1:09:26 uh
1:09:29 case by case basis really.
1:09:31 >> Okay. Thank you. And then uh Mr. Ross or
1:09:34 Dr. Trujill, we still have that matrix
1:09:37 that we created right for certain health
1:09:40 um emergencies. Can you speak to that
1:09:43 real quick?
1:09:45 that that has not changed since the
1:09:46 board took governing board action on
1:09:49 that matrix.
1:09:50 >> All right. So,
1:09:54 okay.
1:09:56 And then Mr. Ross, can you speak to 34
1:10:00 CFR 999.36?
1:10:02 That's a federal like FURPA.
1:10:06 >> Yes, governor board members. That is
1:10:07 furpa. And that provision in that IG
1:10:11 amendment is merely a recognition of the
1:10:13 law which says that if there is uh
1:10:17 that's one of the conditions of
1:10:20 disclosing education information without
1:10:22 parental consent is health and safety
1:10:25 emergency and that's the citation there.
1:10:27 So that that provision is recognizing
1:10:29 that despite the fact that the amendment
1:10:32 is talking about deidentified
1:10:34 and you know that that and aggregate
1:10:36 information
1:10:38 There's still furpa that says that if
1:10:40 there is a health and safety emergency,
1:10:42 then um
1:10:45 identifiable student information can be
1:10:46 shared under federal law.
1:10:48 >> Okay. Thank you.
1:10:51 >> Any other questions? Dr. G, I just have
1:10:55 a a comment. Um would you or a question
1:10:59 and a comment? Would you say that the
1:11:00 Puma County Health Department um has
1:11:03 learned quite a bit from COVID and their
1:11:06 contact tracing? And so if another
1:11:08 outbreak were to happen of that
1:11:10 magnitude, they have all of the tools in
1:11:12 their boxes to not start over, but to go
1:11:16 ahead and move forward, not in the way
1:11:18 that they did before, because they have
1:11:20 learned from what they um did in the
1:11:24 past.
1:11:26 So, number one, I can't speak for the
1:11:29 county, but I can uh
1:11:33 the world of public health, I think, has
1:11:37 learned a lot in the pandemic. And you
1:11:40 have to understand, too, that uh that
1:11:46 there was a lot of variables that played
1:11:48 into that pandemic, right? And and so
1:11:53 one thing that did speak uh very well is
1:11:57 is that the county, if I
1:12:01 do recall correctly, they were
1:12:04 nationally recognized as being a a model
1:12:09 for in in certain
1:12:12 uh
1:12:14 levels of how they
1:12:17 did respond to that pandmic. mic, right?
1:12:21 So, so the county will have the same
1:12:26 challenges, right, as we all do, right?
1:12:30 But I can tell you through through our
1:12:35 partnerships since the pandemic, it has
1:12:38 been a a very positive experience and
1:12:42 and we are building toolkits and and and
1:12:47 practices together so that when that
1:12:51 next um happens,
1:12:54 we're in a much stronger state of
1:12:58 of
1:13:00 preparedness at this point.
1:13:02 >> And as someone who worked um during the
1:13:05 pandemic for the county at u with the
1:13:10 health department trying to get
1:13:11 information out to communities, I will
1:13:14 say that they have learned a lot and
1:13:17 um you know I have put other faith in
1:13:21 the fact that they care about this
1:13:22 community and this school district. So I
1:13:25 will call to the question. Um all those
1:13:27 in favor say I.
1:13:28 >> I
1:13:29 >> I. Those opposed.
1:13:30 >> Oppos.
1:13:31 >> Uh the item passes 4 to one. Thank you,
1:13:34 Dr. G.
1:13:34 >> All right. Thank you.
1:13:36 >> Uh next is um 6.1 governing board
1:13:40 expenditure expenditure priorities for
1:13:42 the budget advisory committee for fiscal
1:13:45 year 27.
1:13:46 >> President members of the governing
1:13:48 board. Um, one of the major functions of
1:13:50 the board is to determine the specific
1:13:53 or potential expenditure priorities that
1:13:56 you would like to assign to your
1:13:57 appointed committee charged with making
1:13:59 budgetary recommendations, budgetary
1:14:01 advisory committee. Uh, we want to get
1:14:04 that item ready to go for you so you can
1:14:06 make those determinations at tonight's
1:14:09 meeting. As we do have our September
1:14:11 meeting, I think coming up in a couple
1:14:12 of days, we want to be ready to go. So,
1:14:15 I've invited our uh chief uh operations
1:14:18 officer, Mr. Hernandez, uh to take us
1:14:20 through just where the committee landed
1:14:22 last year. And as always, the
1:14:25 administration, we always bring our
1:14:26 ideas to the table. Not to say that the
1:14:29 board will accept them or not have any
1:14:31 of your own, but we always like to put
1:14:33 ours in for consideration as well. Mr.
1:14:35 Hernandez,
1:14:36 >> thank you. Um the COO is the sunevil,
1:14:39 the CFO is the wildat.
1:14:45 Hu is Hu can hear me. So,
1:14:49 uh
1:14:50 >> yeah, sorry. Uh so, good evening board
1:14:53 members. Uh so, yeah, this these are our
1:14:55 Dr. these are our recommendations to you
1:14:58 on priorities for the budget for fiscal
1:15:00 year 27 for the budget advisory
1:15:02 committee. Um budget advisory is
1:15:05 actually scheduled to meet for the first
1:15:06 time tomorrow. Uh so, it's very timely
1:15:10 that we that we get these in front of
1:15:11 you. But uh before we move into fiscal
1:15:14 year 27, these were the priorities that
1:15:16 you all approved for the BAC to discuss
1:15:18 for fiscal year 26. So, uh, they went
1:15:21 over summer school, um, specifically,
1:15:24 you know, looking at the academic
1:15:26 benefit of the program, how we fund it
1:15:28 beyond the 2425 school year, looking at
1:15:31 admin positions like, uh, specifically
1:15:33 assistant principles at schools, uh,
1:15:36 reviewing the student fee schedules, and
1:15:39 also looking at PE and fine arts teacher
1:15:41 positions across the district. um when
1:15:44 the committee came to you in February,
1:15:47 these were the recommendations uh that
1:15:49 they brought forth to you. So, summer
1:15:51 school um they asked that we prioritize
1:15:54 transitional years
1:15:56 uh over other types of summer school
1:15:58 programs knowing that we will not have
1:16:00 access to the same levels of funding
1:16:02 like we did in prior years.
1:16:04 administrative positions uh specifically
1:16:07 around assistant principles. The
1:16:09 recommendation was to create a
1:16:10 comprehensive rubric to review
1:16:12 allocations of APS across schools. Uh
1:16:15 because currently under formula, we have
1:16:17 several schools whose enrollments have
1:16:20 fallen before below formula to keep APS.
1:16:23 But due to the kind of the complex
1:16:24 nature of that position, the committee
1:16:26 wanted to look at, you know, looking at
1:16:28 other factors as well as having
1:16:30 departments look at comprehensive review
1:16:33 of potential budget cuts to help sustain
1:16:35 some AP positions if possible. Uh they
1:16:38 recommended keeping the existing student
1:16:40 fee schedule, so no changes to the fee
1:16:42 schedule uh that was adopted uh earlier
1:16:45 this summer. Um and also maintaining all
1:16:48 existing funding levels for fine arts
1:16:49 teachers, for PE teachers at high
1:16:51 schools, and trying to figure out
1:16:53 partnerships and other ways to fund
1:16:55 those PE teachers um at K8 levels. Uh
1:16:58 one of those is uh is currently embedded
1:17:00 into the override is PE teachers in the
1:17:02 K8 uh schools.
1:17:05 So for fiscal year 27, we have three
1:17:08 priorities that uh that we're currently
1:17:11 recommending. I brought my notepad in
1:17:13 case there's more or less that you want
1:17:15 to do. But uh first one is the
1:17:17 centralization of title one. So
1:17:19 currently uh the way that we the
1:17:22 district receives about $25 million in
1:17:25 title one dollars title one allocations
1:17:26 every year. Um we distribute about 70%
1:17:30 of that money directly to the title one
1:17:32 schools. We retain about 30% centrally
1:17:36 most of it for mandatory set aides.
1:17:38 There are certain requirements that the
1:17:39 federal law requires us to spend Title
1:17:41 One dollars on and those are maintained
1:17:44 centrally. School improvement programs,
1:17:47 private schools, family engagement,
1:17:49 preschool, for example. Um, and so we've
1:17:53 seen other school districts, Mesa Public
1:17:56 Schools specifically, who've kind of
1:17:57 done the opposite. they use the dollars
1:18:01 more centrally for district-wide
1:18:02 initiatives that benefit the entire set
1:18:05 of title one schools or the entire
1:18:07 district and a smaller allocation going
1:18:09 to the schools for kind of school-based
1:18:11 initiatives. And so the idea is to is
1:18:14 there a way for us to look at trying to
1:18:16 follow a model to more effectively and
1:18:18 efficiently use title one dollars in
1:18:21 order to fund district-wide priorities
1:18:23 that would benefit the entire set of
1:18:25 schools. um versus kind of what we've
1:18:28 got today which is you know essentially
1:18:30 all but two schools receiving an
1:18:31 allocation and they each do everything
1:18:34 differently according to their uh
1:18:36 instructional improvement plan. Um the
1:18:38 next one is the an attendance initiative
1:18:40 funding. So one of the things that we've
1:18:43 obviously discussed in in addition to
1:18:44 enrollment is talking about improving
1:18:46 attendance rates at our schools. And so
1:18:49 currently our schools most title one
1:18:52 schools have a school committee liaison
1:18:53 position. Um this tends to be kind of
1:18:55 like your community and family
1:18:56 engagement position at your school
1:18:58 campuses. And then they all have an
1:19:00 attendance tech or a registar. I mean
1:19:03 these are people who I mean they do
1:19:04 exactly that. They maintain attendance
1:19:06 records, registration records for the
1:19:08 students that enroll on those campuses.
1:19:10 One of the functions of those attendance
1:19:12 texts and registars is to follow up on
1:19:15 reports that are provided through
1:19:16 synergy which is our student information
1:19:18 system to principles to say here's a
1:19:20 pattern of students who are missing
1:19:22 multiple days. students who may already
1:19:25 be eligible because they haven't been
1:19:26 here for 10 days and should be dropped.
1:19:29 Looking at a variety of attendance data,
1:19:32 what we're not what we haven't been
1:19:33 doing is trying to deploy resources to
1:19:36 catch those kids before it gets to a
1:19:38 point where they have to be dropped,
1:19:40 right? Where the school community
1:19:41 liaison can then work with the
1:19:43 attendance tech to say, hey, you know,
1:19:45 this student, you know, student A has
1:19:48 missed four consecutive days unexcused.
1:19:50 We haven't heard from mom or dad. The
1:19:52 school community liaison can then engage
1:19:54 with the family to say, "Hey, what's
1:19:56 going on? Is it a transportation issue?
1:19:58 Is it a you need a uniform, you know,
1:20:01 connect you with the clothing bank? Do
1:20:02 you need medical services?" Something
1:20:04 where that's community leaison can be
1:20:06 the partner for those families so that
1:20:09 those students can then become
1:20:10 re-engaged before it's too late. Go
1:20:13 ahead.
1:20:15 Yeah, I want to jump in here because in
1:20:18 November the board's going to get a more
1:20:19 comprehensive uh three strategy approach
1:20:22 to attendance and truency interruption
1:20:24 and credit currency prevent credit
1:20:27 deficiency prevention. up. We know that
1:20:29 there's a financial aspect to this and
1:20:31 our ask is at least to have budget
1:20:34 advisory look at it because one of our
1:20:36 key learnings as we interfaced with
1:20:38 other districts around the state uh a
1:20:40 week ago at at the uh truency and
1:20:42 absenteeism conference is the absence of
1:20:46 school level outreach teams personally
1:20:49 connecting with families
1:20:51 really exacerbates absenteeism and
1:20:53 truency. And so if we can look at
1:20:56 pivoting uh our school community
1:20:59 liaison, I'm not saying that the work of
1:21:01 organizing events is not important. It
1:21:03 is, but actually pivoting the bulk of
1:21:06 their work to the outreach of getting in
1:21:09 touch with families, especially at the
1:21:10 elementary level, to get them back into
1:21:12 school and to really connect them to the
1:21:15 resources that might be or the lack of
1:21:17 resources that might be contributing to
1:21:19 the absenteeism. we can really look at
1:21:22 an easy return on investment because you
1:21:24 would just look at your attendance
1:21:25 numbers, right? So, we would connect it
1:21:27 to that. But that's our our ask, you
1:21:29 know, in terms of of at least having
1:21:31 budget advisory look at that.
1:21:33 >> Yeah. Um and and as I mentioned in in
1:21:35 the other one, um there is a component
1:21:38 that the board committed to in the
1:21:40 override to try to fund a portion of
1:21:42 this initiative, but certainly um as Dr.
1:21:44 Thruhill mentioned, the budget advisory
1:21:46 committee would be welcome to to take a
1:21:48 look at this a little bit deeper. And
1:21:49 then finally, um resource deployment
1:21:52 criteria for schools. Uh basically a
1:21:54 fancy way of saying how can we improve
1:21:57 um or do better in terms of how we
1:21:59 allocate resources, be they positions or
1:22:02 operational dollars to schools that
1:22:04 don't just account for student
1:22:06 enrollment. Right now, the basis for a
1:22:08 lot of what we do, teaching positions,
1:22:10 school supplies, you know, janitorial
1:22:13 supplies, everything under kind of under
1:22:15 the sun, seriously, is managed based on
1:22:19 how many kids you've got on your campus.
1:22:21 Um, but sometimes what we're finding is
1:22:24 that schools that are smaller compared
1:22:26 to schools that are bigger have
1:22:28 essentially the same types of resources
1:22:30 as bigger schools. There's kind of
1:22:31 questions about inequities. There's also
1:22:34 questions around efficiency, right? Is
1:22:35 this the most efficient way to be
1:22:37 allocating resources around positions or
1:22:40 deploying other resources around
1:22:42 operations? And so, are there other
1:22:44 aspects to the funding formula that we
1:22:47 can look at besides student enrollment
1:22:49 um as a way to deploy dollars to
1:22:51 schools?
1:22:53 >> Yes, Dr. Trio.
1:22:57 This is a this is a tough one and I know
1:22:59 people watching this right now there's
1:23:01 passion points around this. Uh but we
1:23:05 have to start looking at at least the
1:23:08 critical question of are we deploying
1:23:10 our resources in the most equitable way.
1:23:14 Right now there are aspects of our
1:23:17 staffing and support that every school
1:23:19 gets a position no matter what. You can
1:23:23 be a school of 300. You can be a school
1:23:25 of 700 and you'll get one of this
1:23:29 particular position. But what if you
1:23:31 have a school that demonstrates a
1:23:33 stronger need? They have a higher
1:23:35 percentage of XED. They have a higher
1:23:38 percentage of English language learners.
1:23:40 They need more intensive support. Should
1:23:43 not they receive more of that particular
1:23:45 resource? So we we do that basically
1:23:48 throughout our staffing models. And then
1:23:51 you also have the staffing just based
1:23:53 off of numeric. And so we felt like it
1:23:56 might be a good starting point to have
1:23:58 budget advisory really start to take a
1:24:00 look at how we staff and if we should
1:24:03 look at more of a needs-based develop
1:24:06 criteria for how we deploy resources.
1:24:10 Everything from reading and math
1:24:11 interventionists to um to counselors to
1:24:15 social workers. How are we distributing
1:24:18 those resources that isn't just tied to
1:24:20 a specific numeric? That's been a long
1:24:23 controversial kind of uh topic here in
1:24:25 TUSD, but I think given the financial
1:24:28 challenges that not just TUSD but public
1:24:30 schools are going to be facing and where
1:24:32 resources are going to be a little bit
1:24:34 more finite, we're probably going to
1:24:36 have to take this on and and look at
1:24:38 alternative staffing models. So that's
1:24:39 why we brought this one to the table.
1:24:41 >> Yeah.
1:24:43 >> So those are the three recommended
1:24:44 priorities. just to kind of go over uh
1:24:46 the current status of the committee. Um
1:24:48 so there are currently six vacant
1:24:50 positions um on the budget advisory
1:24:52 committee. Most recently we had the
1:24:54 departure of Stacy Gist who was the
1:24:56 principal at Valencia Middle School. Um
1:24:59 as a reminder uh budget advisory
1:25:01 committee members have to be affiliated
1:25:02 with the district. There are some uh
1:25:05 categories that would disqualify people.
1:25:08 Um but all in all, it's it's pretty
1:25:10 open-ended in terms of the affiliation
1:25:11 with the district. Uh the board office
1:25:14 did receive three applications earlier
1:25:16 this year. They were incomplete. They've
1:25:18 followed up with them. Uh they're
1:25:20 waiting for some responses. We have had
1:25:22 other applicants and so this is kind of
1:25:24 an ongoing process. Um I have the link
1:25:28 on the on the presentation if you know
1:25:29 if anybody out in the community wants to
1:25:31 click on that and look at the
1:25:32 application. Like I said, the committee
1:25:34 is scheduled to meet tomorrow for the
1:25:36 first time just mostly to do
1:25:38 housekeeping, set up their schedule,
1:25:39 kind of figure out like how they want to
1:25:41 tackle this. Um, these are three pretty
1:25:43 meaty topics. Um, and as you can see,
1:25:46 these are the current members of, uh,
1:25:49 the committee. Uh, you renewed several
1:25:51 of them last fall. Um, and but we are
1:25:54 still looking for six more qualified
1:25:57 individuals to participate with the
1:25:58 budget advisory committee. So, with
1:26:01 that, I will take your questions.
1:26:03 >> Uh, governing board members, who wants
1:26:05 to go first?
1:26:08 Dr. Shaw.
1:26:10 Right. Thank you, President Extra, and
1:26:12 thank you for the presentation and for
1:26:14 um all the ideas. Um you I think it's
1:26:16 really timely to address some of these
1:26:18 things regardless of what happens with
1:26:20 the override. If override passes,
1:26:23 um as we looked at the the numbers, the
1:26:25 $45 million, it goes really quickly with
1:26:27 how big our district is. Uh and if the
1:26:30 override passes, we want to make sure
1:26:31 we're using that money in the most
1:26:33 effective way to really address the
1:26:35 promises that we made to our community
1:26:37 uh to get it passed. now but over a
1:26:39 dozen pass then it's going to be even
1:26:41 more important to make sure we're
1:26:42 utilizing those res very limited
1:26:44 resources that we have uh in the most
1:26:46 effective way. So I I I think it's a
1:26:48 great time to start talking about some
1:26:50 of this resource allocation uh with this
1:26:52 budget advisory committee to help uh
1:26:55 ensure that with or without the override
1:26:56 that all the funding is going to the
1:26:58 best way to the the schools that need it
1:27:00 to the distributed and and resources so
1:27:03 that the schools can really utilize it
1:27:05 effectively.
1:27:08 Extram.
1:27:08 >> Yes, Michelle.
1:27:09 >> Thank you for your presentation. Um, I
1:27:12 do like all of the recommended
1:27:14 priorities. Um, but a couple others that
1:27:18 I would like to suggest to see if the
1:27:20 board is is interested is uh see if we
1:27:23 can get or how much it would be for a
1:27:27 garden at every school. And uh
1:27:30 composting. I know we kind of have a a
1:27:33 consultant working on the composting as
1:27:36 of now, but um I think every every
1:27:40 school deserves a garden.
1:27:48 >> Was that it, Michelle?
1:27:50 >> Okay, go ahead, Mr. Romero. So going
1:27:53 back to talking about attendance
1:27:55 initiative funding um talking about
1:27:56 deploying resources
1:27:58 stronger synergy between school
1:28:00 community liaison
1:28:02 um and and taking more of as opposed to
1:28:05 setting up events more towards you know
1:28:07 the attendance aspect of it. Do we have
1:28:12 any type of data showing based on
1:28:14 schools because I know every not every
1:28:16 school has a community liaison or
1:28:18 someone that's kind of in that role of
1:28:22 the job that they're doing that ties
1:28:25 into their attendance um for those
1:28:28 schools. Do we know?
1:28:31 >> Yes, Dr. Trillo.
1:28:34 So really
1:28:35 >> the only we don't have any school level
1:28:38 teams that actually meet and crunch
1:28:41 attendance data and identify trends and
1:28:44 go and engage families. That is a first
1:28:46 level strategy that districts utilize
1:28:49 that are more successful in reducing
1:28:51 absenteeism which is why we see bullet
1:28:53 number two. But what exists right now is
1:28:56 we have kind of a bare minimum which we
1:28:58 have an attendance tech and those folks
1:29:00 work very very hard. Attendance texts
1:29:02 are in every single school. They
1:29:04 generate reports and they do sort of
1:29:08 their charge is notifying teachers,
1:29:11 notifying parents when their kids miss
1:29:13 school or when there's unexcused
1:29:14 absences, but that's it. There is no
1:29:17 further engagement strategy beyond that.
1:29:20 And so when you look at our lineup of
1:29:23 school level positions, the closest that
1:29:26 we have when you review the job
1:29:27 description that could probably most
1:29:29 quickly pivot towards that work is a
1:29:32 school community liaison because so much
1:29:34 of getting students back to school
1:29:38 involves parental engagement, which is a
1:29:40 natural part of their job and and
1:29:42 actually what needs to be happening more
1:29:44 often. So when we really did a deep dive
1:29:47 on on how we could get this first level
1:29:49 of the of the absenteeism interruption
1:29:51 infrastructure established, this is
1:29:54 going to be a cornerstone piece like so
1:29:56 how much does it cost? What kind of
1:29:57 return on investment do we want to you
1:30:00 know measure it against? How are we
1:30:02 going to really show that this is going
1:30:04 to move the ball forward? So it's just
1:30:07 an initial cost analysis, you know, in
1:30:09 terms of what it's going to cost because
1:30:11 not every school has this position.
1:30:13 And then also then kind of looking at
1:30:15 that and I I think we've already kind of
1:30:18 had enough conversation with his heart
1:30:19 to talk about, you know, we know where
1:30:21 our enrollments kind of's been going. We
1:30:24 may we need to adjust it to attendance
1:30:26 and absenteeism and and all of these
1:30:29 other issues that go along with it. And
1:30:31 I know within our system we have
1:30:33 enrollment ambassadors. Have we looked
1:30:35 at maybe since those are really not
1:30:38 being effective utilizing those to be
1:30:41 part of this attendance initiative that
1:30:43 are filling in those roles? And then do
1:30:47 we see it where there's a more of a
1:30:49 drastic need high school versus middle
1:30:52 school versus uh K6 versus K5.
1:30:58 So, I'm I'm glad, you know, we're we're
1:31:00 talking about absenteeism because it
1:31:02 when you're talking about overall
1:31:03 enrollment, it's a two-headed beast. The
1:31:06 first head of the beast is very public
1:31:07 and very visible. It's withdrawals. It's
1:31:10 families that leave the district. But
1:31:12 it's that second head of the beast
1:31:14 that's quieter, that is more in the
1:31:16 background. That is extreme absenteeism
1:31:19 and truency where kids miss days and
1:31:21 days and days and days and we don't
1:31:23 collect funding for them but yet they
1:31:25 remain, you know, on the district's
1:31:27 registration docket and they bring your
1:31:30 overall 40th and 100th day count. And
1:31:31 more more important than that, it's
1:31:33 young people out of school. So, it's a
1:31:35 moral imperative to get them back in.
1:31:38 Uh, I'm not going to surprise anybody
1:31:40 here, but our internal data, your the
1:31:43 higher up you go past fifth grade, the
1:31:45 more extreme the tardiness and the
1:31:47 truency becomes, right? So, you start
1:31:49 getting into middle school, you start
1:31:51 getting into 9th and 10th. It levels out
1:31:54 a little bit for upper classmen because
1:31:56 at that point, you have credit
1:31:58 accumulation. You have a focus on on
1:32:00 cleaning up credit deficiency for a lot
1:32:02 of kids. They want to get graduated. But
1:32:04 when you start looking at 7th, 8th, 9th,
1:32:07 10th, that is going to be your peak of
1:32:10 where it goes. We also are looking at it
1:32:14 through the lens of truency and
1:32:16 absenteeism, interruption and prevention
1:32:18 early for both secondary and elementary.
1:32:22 Elementary is going to be more of a
1:32:23 parental engagement component because
1:32:26 we're dealing with our youngest learners
1:32:28 and more of a direct intervention with
1:32:29 young people at the high schools in the
1:32:31 middle. So, it's kind of an overall view
1:32:33 of just, you know, where our data takes
1:32:35 us right now. And
1:32:36 >> and I guess that would be for me as far
1:32:38 as in our recommended priorities. And
1:32:40 maybe we look at that at a high school
1:32:43 level versus, you know, the the middle
1:32:45 school and the elementary. So, if we
1:32:48 don't have the funds to start it full
1:32:52 districtwide, focus on the areas where
1:32:55 you know it is an issue that is a
1:32:57 problem would be one of my at least
1:32:59 input.
1:33:00 >> Yeah. And so to attack on kind of to Dr.
1:33:02 Thrujillo's question or answer to your
1:33:04 question about the enrollment
1:33:05 ambassadors. So one of the things that
1:33:06 we've shifted with enrollment
1:33:07 ambassadors is you know for
1:33:09 traditionally we've made enrollment
1:33:11 ambassadors assigned to the regions
1:33:13 right every region has one. Now instead
1:33:15 of taking a look at the district you
1:33:17 know kind of vertically we're going to
1:33:18 take a look at it horizontally. So we're
1:33:19 going to take a look at it exactly the
1:33:21 way you're describing it and take a look
1:33:22 at grade bands. Right. put enrollment
1:33:25 ambassadors focusing on elementary so
1:33:27 that their focus is different than an
1:33:29 enrollment ambassador focused on middle
1:33:31 schools, right? Because the strategy has
1:33:32 to look very different. My 15-year-old
1:33:36 is tardy. It happens, right? He's a high
1:33:39 school student. It's really hard to kind
1:33:40 of get him out of bed. But my sixth
1:33:42 grader, I mean, pretty quick, right? So,
1:33:45 the way that they're going to be dealt
1:33:46 with from the enrollment ambassador
1:33:48 perspective is going to be different for
1:33:49 my 15-year-old than it is going to be
1:33:50 for my 11-year-old. So we want to take a
1:33:53 look at how we more effectively treat
1:33:55 them at the gradeband level versus at
1:33:57 the regional level.
1:33:59 >> Great. Thank you.
1:34:00 >> Yep. Dr. Sha, one suggest I love for a
1:34:02 governing board to vet is to have um CTE
1:34:05 is something that the back looked at. So
1:34:08 I had a chance to be at two high schools
1:34:09 this past month um at Choya and all the
1:34:12 different programs, sports medicine,
1:34:14 other things there. uh and the Sabino
1:34:16 and talking to the principal there about
1:34:17 what he's trying to expand to compete
1:34:19 against uh some of the surrounding
1:34:20 districts and surrounding high schools
1:34:22 on the east side. Uh and with the
1:34:24 override there's there's money dedicated
1:34:26 to CTE. So instead of making sure, you
1:34:28 know, I'm glad we have these initiatives
1:34:29 and if we have an expansion or even a
1:34:31 contraction of CTE in the future, uh
1:34:34 having the budget advisory committee
1:34:35 looking at not just what's like sounds
1:34:36 like a cool program, but what has like a
1:34:39 good marketing uh what is what we really
1:34:41 need in our district, what are the jobs
1:34:43 that we're trying to prepare our
1:34:45 students for and how we can really uh
1:34:47 use our CT programs to drive enrollment
1:34:49 and compete against some of the
1:34:50 surrounding districts. So I would
1:34:52 recommend uh CTE as one of the uh budget
1:34:55 advisory committee priorities for this
1:34:57 year and look at like just where CTE
1:34:59 stands and really work with Chuck on
1:35:01 like what is your systematic approach on
1:35:02 expanding CTE if we uh are able to do so
1:35:06 uh with the override or other sources of
1:35:07 funding so that we can really compete
1:35:09 more effectively. What's what's going to
1:35:10 be cost-ffective expansions and and how
1:35:12 to market the best.
1:35:13 >> Yeah.
1:35:14 >> And I wonder if um the first and third
1:35:16 pieces here could be combined. So a lot
1:35:18 of it seems to be resource allocation
1:35:20 whether it's resource allocation of
1:35:22 things we're funding through M or from
1:35:24 title one. Uh and so I would recommend
1:35:26 when we make a final motion that we
1:35:28 combine the first and third here to be
1:35:30 this resource employment in our schools
1:35:32 including distribution of title one
1:35:37 miss.
1:35:38 >> Yes Michelle
1:35:40 >> thank you Dr. Shaw for bringing all
1:35:41 those things up. I agree with the um you
1:35:44 know jointing of the first and third uh
1:35:47 priority and especially the CTE. Um one
1:35:51 of the things that I tried to do a while
1:35:53 back is to get uh I guess half a credit
1:35:56 of uh CTE during freshman year, but I
1:36:00 think Mr. McCullum said that freshman
1:36:02 CTE isn't funded. Um, and so it would be
1:36:06 great if they could see how we can get
1:36:08 that funded so kids can get into that
1:36:10 program earlier.
1:36:14 >> Doc, Dr. Truhe,
1:36:16 >> I was a a principal at a time when it
1:36:19 was still funded and it was absolutely
1:36:22 wonderful. Uh, every single freshman in
1:36:24 the system would have an exploratory CTE
1:36:27 course. They would have a smorgus board
1:36:29 of all the different programs available
1:36:32 and it was a semester. So it would fit
1:36:34 with health or PE. You could flip-flop
1:36:37 it. And it dramatically it dramatically
1:36:40 increases the amount of students that go
1:36:43 into a CTE program. Sophomore year. The
1:36:46 district benefits because every time you
1:36:48 get a program completer, you get more
1:36:51 Perkins grant money from the federal
1:36:53 government. Your chances of getting a
1:36:55 student to actually complete a CTE
1:36:57 program are dramatically increased if
1:36:59 they started sophomore year. If you hook
1:37:01 them in 11th or 12th, they might take
1:37:03 the courses for a few years, which is
1:37:05 great, but you don't get the completer
1:37:07 benefits and they don't get the
1:37:08 certification that they need for that
1:37:10 area. So, when you talk about a ninth
1:37:13 grade course, you significantly increase
1:37:15 the amount of students that go
1:37:17 immediately to sophomore and take these
1:37:19 two and three these two-year programs by
1:37:21 the time they walk. So, I think that's
1:37:23 another area we can do like a cost
1:37:25 analysis. And that's also where you pick
1:37:27 up where Dr. Shaw's talking about. You
1:37:29 get the students giving you the direct
1:37:31 feedback about the most popular programs
1:37:34 or the programs that they want to see
1:37:36 replicated because that's what that
1:37:37 survey course does whether it's robotics
1:37:40 or 3D animation or it's the uh
1:37:43 automotive technology folks. It gives
1:37:46 you a bird's eye view of where you want
1:37:48 to expand sections. I remember having
1:37:51 all that information available and by
1:37:53 the time I was, you know, late into my
1:37:54 principal ship, the funding had already
1:37:56 been cut and we were kind of just
1:37:58 operating in the dark again. So I think
1:38:00 that that might be something that budget
1:38:02 advisory can look at.
1:38:03 >> Yeah, the freshman can participate. It's
1:38:06 just Yeah, we don't get funded for them.
1:38:08 >> Yeah.
1:38:10 >> Um Miss Lunar Rose and then Dr. Shaw.
1:38:12 >> Okay. Thank you. Um as a board liaison,
1:38:16 um we do have a meeting tomorrow. So, I
1:38:19 appreciate the conversation. Um, I think
1:38:22 because Ricky and I were talking about
1:38:24 this a little bit earlier today, it
1:38:26 these are kind of heavy topics. Um,
1:38:28 they're kind of meaty. So, I I just want
1:38:31 to make sure we're not throwing a lot,
1:38:34 especially since we do have lesser
1:38:36 members right now of the BAC. Um, and so
1:38:39 for those who are listening, we really,
1:38:41 really, really, really need some uh new
1:38:44 members. Um you can go to our website
1:38:46 and um go to the governing board page
1:38:49 and under board committees. Um but uh
1:38:53 that being said, I do like the um
1:38:56 combination of title one and and
1:38:59 resource deployment. Not sure. I mean,
1:39:02 we could still obviously
1:39:05 flush that out. Um and um I do like Miss
1:39:10 Shaw's suggestions. I'm just not sure
1:39:12 right now where we are. Um I'd kind of
1:39:16 like to see the CTE first and then maybe
1:39:21 somehow bring on the I mean I think the
1:39:23 composting is great. I just want to make
1:39:26 sure that because these are kind of a
1:39:28 little bit heavier than some of the ones
1:39:30 we've had in the past that we give them
1:39:33 equal capacity.
1:39:35 >> Right. I if I may, Miss Extra, I just
1:39:38 think the garden program is kind of
1:39:40 lowhanging fruit and we already have it.
1:39:42 It's easy to replicate. Um, and it's
1:39:46 also something that can drive
1:39:47 enrollment. We can push every school in
1:39:49 TUSD has a garden, you know, and your
1:39:51 child will be in that garden. So, um,
1:39:56 yeah, I hope the board can consider
1:39:57 adding that as a priority.
1:39:59 >> We can have that discussion.
1:40:03 Dr.
1:40:04 Um I will say I'm going to was the
1:40:06 guardian composting is great. This is a
1:40:07 really great implementation of the um
1:40:09 climate and sustainability policy and we
1:40:12 did hire a consultant. So in terms of
1:40:14 backs work I would maybe wait to see
1:40:16 what the consultant says who has done
1:40:18 these kinds of things around the country
1:40:20 um to see like how they would recommend
1:40:21 implementing some of the pieces of the
1:40:23 climate action policy including the the
1:40:25 composting that we had included in
1:40:27 there. Uh and I have one other um topic
1:40:30 I'm going to propose for the budget
1:40:31 advisory committee and that would be
1:40:33 early child education and before and
1:40:35 after school programs. Um
1:40:38 we know that federal funding is drying
1:40:40 up for a lot of these programs before
1:40:41 after school care. Uh we've had some
1:40:43 really tough conversations on this DAS
1:40:45 about tuition costs for preschool and
1:40:47 how we're going to continue to funding
1:40:49 that. uh we know that we need to be more
1:40:51 competitive with other districts when it
1:40:52 comes to before and after school
1:40:54 programming uh so that parents can
1:40:56 choose that and and and still work and
1:40:58 do everything they need to do. I love
1:41:00 for the back to take a look at, you
1:41:01 know, what exists, what's the landscape
1:41:03 on this, you know, how do we stay
1:41:04 competitive with other uh districts and
1:41:06 charters um when we offer our before
1:41:08 school program, how we're going to
1:41:10 continue to fund uh ECE with or without
1:41:13 the over. I know ECE was part of that
1:41:15 override package as well, the early
1:41:17 childhood education. Uh so I think that
1:41:19 would be a great topic for the back to
1:41:21 really dive into uh and really come back
1:41:23 to the board with some recommendations
1:41:24 on how to best use the funds we have
1:41:26 available with or without the override
1:41:28 on managing our early child education as
1:41:32 well as some of our before and afterare
1:41:33 programs for our kids.
1:41:37 >> Okay. I'm a little concerned with the
1:41:39 centralization of title one funds. Um
1:41:42 how would that affect each school? So
1:41:44 what we would do is essentially the per
1:41:47 pupil allocations would be dropped. We
1:41:49 would still have to follow the rules,
1:41:51 right? In other words, only schools that
1:41:53 have a a poverty rate, I guess, of you
1:41:56 can call it of 40% and above are
1:41:58 eligible to receive title one dollars.
1:42:00 So we still have to provide dollars to
1:42:02 the schools. The idea is that we would
1:42:05 try to focus on are there district-wide
1:42:07 initiatives, curriculum initiatives,
1:42:09 family initiatives, professional
1:42:11 development initiatives that could be
1:42:14 better funded or more efficiently or
1:42:16 more effectively funded if they were
1:42:18 funded more of on a district-wide level.
1:42:20 Um, kind of like we do currently with
1:42:22 curriculum service providers, right?
1:42:23 Title One funds all the curriculum
1:42:25 service providers in the district. That
1:42:27 is an initiative that we rolled out as
1:42:29 part of professional development for
1:42:30 teachers ties into school improvement
1:42:33 and so that's a kind of a better
1:42:35 strategy to have professional
1:42:36 development and PLC's in the schools.
1:42:39 Are there other ways that we can
1:42:40 replicate that type of work across the
1:42:44 district?
1:42:45 I mean certainly not every school
1:42:48 district does it that way where the
1:42:49 majority of the money stays central and
1:42:50 the minority you know kind of goes to
1:42:52 schools. Um we've been doing it this
1:42:54 way. I mean, we were doing it this way
1:42:56 when I was in the district 25 years ago.
1:42:58 So,
1:43:00 >> so can you give an example of what that
1:43:02 would look like? Um, if you were to take
1:43:04 away, you know, if you were to flip-flop
1:43:08 the um percentages, what does, give me
1:43:11 an example of what school like Borton,
1:43:15 what do they use their Title One funds
1:43:17 for and how that would affect what they
1:43:20 use it for? Yeah, I I think it's a great
1:43:22 question. And so
1:43:25 I'm going to use like school A because I
1:43:26 don't I don't want to freak out school.
1:43:28 So I'm I'm going to say let's say
1:43:30 >> I know I'm
1:43:32 mean Bordon.
1:43:33 >> I did not mean Bordon. I'm going to say
1:43:35 like let's say that school A has its
1:43:38 longstanding
1:43:40 site managed title budget and they fund
1:43:42 a library assistant and then they fund
1:43:44 maybe two TAs and then maybe they fund
1:43:48 uh what's another eligible position like
1:43:50 that
1:43:51 >> an interventionist
1:43:52 >> they might fund an additional a math
1:43:54 interventionist right so if there is a
1:43:58 centralization of title funds all of
1:44:01 that budget is absorbed and the district
1:44:04 ultimately The governing board
1:44:06 determines as all of those budgets go in
1:44:08 a big pot of money what this governing
1:44:11 board views as district needs and where
1:44:14 those district needs are to be deployed
1:44:16 using title dollars. So the other side
1:44:19 of that the district the governing board
1:44:22 could decide we really want to lower
1:44:26 counselor ratios or we want to support
1:44:29 areas because it's an add-on. We want to
1:44:31 support areas around the district where
1:44:33 case loads are excessively high. You
1:44:35 could then use your title to aim
1:44:37 additional counselors at those schools.
1:44:40 You could use those additional title
1:44:42 dollars to aim TAS at maybe early
1:44:47 education classrooms that are already
1:44:50 crowded. You would have that ability.
1:44:52 So, it ties back to the resource
1:44:54 deployment conversation that we were
1:44:57 having. But to echo, President Extro
1:45:00 brings up a very very valid question
1:45:02 preparing the governing board for what
1:45:05 the potential noise would be. Right? So
1:45:06 in a school a situation, you would
1:45:09 probably get emails, you know, that,
1:45:11 hey, listen, these people have been
1:45:12 working, you know, they've been in these
1:45:14 schools. That's why it's such a tough
1:45:16 conversation. Then you layer on that
1:45:20 Congress, I believe the cut to title one
1:45:23 will affect us to the tune of about 7
1:45:26 million,
1:45:26 >> right? So now your overall title dollars
1:45:29 are getting small enough anyway where
1:45:31 you may want to consider centralization.
1:45:37 >> M Mr. Romero,
1:45:38 >> so going back with Mrs. Extra, what she
1:45:40 had mentioned on that also on our
1:45:43 current member list, I know Stacy's no
1:45:46 longer there, but anybody else on there
1:45:48 represent principles that is on our
1:45:51 >> No, we we currently don't have a She was
1:45:54 the principal representative, if you
1:45:55 will. Yeah. Yeah. So, I guess my concern
1:45:58 would be again like you said, if we take
1:46:00 control out of our principles, you know,
1:46:03 for the money that they have, for the
1:46:05 needs that they see and we, you know, we
1:46:08 pull it on out, what's the
1:46:11 repercussions that we're going to see
1:46:13 there, and especially if there is no
1:46:15 representation for any type of, you
1:46:18 know, school administration on that
1:46:20 committee, um, that would be a concern
1:46:22 of mine. Yeah, we would still obviously
1:46:24 as part of the conversations, we would
1:46:26 still engage principles, regional
1:46:28 assistant superintendents to kind of the
1:46:30 way we did it with assistant principles,
1:46:32 right? It was kind of difficult to
1:46:33 really kind of corral all these schools,
1:46:35 but all five regionals have really good
1:46:37 context about how APS work. I think that
1:46:40 kind of context could work from the
1:46:42 principles through the regionals.
1:46:44 Obviously, the greater benefit would be
1:46:45 to have an actual principal
1:46:47 representative on the committee. That
1:46:48 would be the ideal situation. But I
1:46:50 think there are different ways to make
1:46:52 sure that we get those concerns to the
1:46:54 committee from that population.
1:47:00 >> Is that it?
1:47:01 >> I think so. Um I just wanted to um
1:47:04 reiterate the fact that um since we
1:47:07 don't have a principal principles out
1:47:09 there, you want to join the BAC
1:47:12 >> um or or APS or anybody um that's you
1:47:17 know in in administration that would
1:47:19 like to have a voice in making sure
1:47:21 >> maybe Eric Yulberg at Borton.
1:47:23 >> Yeah, there you go.
1:47:27 Um and then perhaps maybe our um
1:47:30 communications team can put out some
1:47:32 social media posts um not just for the
1:47:35 BAC but for all the committees that we
1:47:37 represent. It it's just such a passion
1:47:40 point because we know there's amazing
1:47:42 individuals everywhere I go that are
1:47:44 funded out of title. And that bumps up
1:47:46 against what researchbased best
1:47:49 practices support us being able to do
1:47:52 with title. Like we know that early
1:47:53 literacy is where it's at. We know that
1:47:56 reading interventionists and math
1:47:57 interventionists are needed in K2, K3.
1:48:01 Title gives you an opportunity to do
1:48:03 that. However, it butts up against site
1:48:06 manage budgets that feature amazing
1:48:08 people doing great things for kids. So,
1:48:10 not an easy conversation. It's more of a
1:48:13 where the board stands on how it wants
1:48:15 to deploy resources conversation than
1:48:17 anything else.
1:48:21 >> Yeah, Dr. Shaw,
1:48:22 >> I'm not sure how the agendas are looking
1:48:23 like. uh Miss Luna Rose, but you know, I
1:48:26 know this might delay things, you know,
1:48:27 into the later winter or spring, but I
1:48:30 focusing on recruitment. Uh I would
1:48:32 really love to get that perspective from
1:48:33 more principles and other people from
1:48:35 our community. We can do some work on
1:48:36 recruitment over the next month to get
1:48:38 them involved on these issues.
1:48:39 >> I do think we are actually talking about
1:48:41 that tomorrow. So yeah,
1:48:44 but thank you Dr. Shaw. That will that
1:48:46 should actually be a priority as well.
1:48:50 >> Miss Extra.
1:48:51 >> Yes, Miss Shaw. Um, does the BAC charter
1:48:54 allow for former employees to serve?
1:48:58 >> Uh,
1:48:59 I don't know that there's any limitation
1:49:01 for former employees. I think as long as
1:49:03 they meet one of these criteria and
1:49:05 don't meet any of the disqualifying
1:49:07 criteria.
1:49:09 So, if you have a former employee who
1:49:11 happens to be a parent or a community
1:49:13 member in the district, I think they fit
1:49:16 that. Well, if it's
1:49:19 keeping people out, um,
1:49:21 >> yeah, the limitations on keeping people
1:49:23 out are like really specific. Like you
1:49:25 can't be like a business owner who does
1:49:27 business with the district, for example,
1:49:29 or somebody who's sued the district,
1:49:32 >> you know, some it's been it's like very
1:49:34 narrowly tailored. These are broader.
1:49:37 >> They just they just want to have TUSD
1:49:40 affiliation is really kind of the
1:49:41 qualifier. former employees probably
1:49:44 >> former employees could I don't see
1:49:46 unless Mr. Ross
1:49:47 >> Mr. found anything in the bylaws
1:49:50 >> I'm looking
1:49:52 >> cuz if it if it keeps former employees
1:49:55 out I would recommend uh modifying the
1:49:57 charter because I'm sure you know former
1:50:00 employees would have a lot more time to
1:50:02 serve.
1:50:04 Um,
1:50:05 and then just before we let this item
1:50:07 go, I do want to pitch one more time to
1:50:11 uh have my colleagues or just the uh
1:50:15 committee itself uh look into the
1:50:17 gardening program. I think it's really
1:50:19 important. Um although you know for me
1:50:25 the budget advisory committee is kind of
1:50:27 where my dreams go to die.
1:50:31 librarians, elimination of student fees,
1:50:33 PE at every school, expansion of fine
1:50:36 arts.
1:50:36 >> Really gonna make you feel
1:50:37 >> maybe it's better it doesn't wind up on
1:50:39 that committee.
1:50:40 >> Kind of like Borton,
1:50:42 >> but uh I think it would be promising if
1:50:45 we had that it could boost enrollment.
1:50:47 It could be something we can brag about.
1:50:49 So, please do consider it.
1:50:51 >> Thank you, Miss Shaw. Was there
1:50:53 anything, Mr. Ross, that you were
1:50:54 staring at me?
1:50:57 So the uh the charter
1:51:00 states that
1:51:02 uh community members of the BAC must be
1:51:04 affiliated with TOSD including
1:51:06 parents/guardians of TOSD students, TOSD
1:51:09 employees, representatives of the Tono
1:51:11 ODM nation, representatives of Pascoyaki
1:51:14 tribe, owners of businesses within
1:51:15 TUSD's boundaries, or community members
1:51:19 residing within TUSD. So that's pretty
1:51:21 that last one's pretty broad.
1:51:24 >> Thank you.
1:51:27 So, do you want a motion?
1:51:30 >> I've written some of them down. I'll
1:51:34 >> let me know what you want to do. I know
1:51:35 Miss Shaw has a very
1:51:37 >> Well, I'll move to add um gardens
1:51:41 at every school and composting uh to
1:51:44 this to the as a priority.
1:51:47 >> I'll second since I'm closest to you.
1:51:53 >> All those in favor say I. I
1:51:55 >> I
1:51:56 >> those opposed.
1:51:58 Motion carries.
1:52:00 >> Yay. Thank you.
1:52:03 And I'll Oh, wait. It's
1:52:05 >> Do we have to move the entire item
1:52:07 still?
1:52:07 >> Yeah, Dr. Shaw.
1:52:08 >> So, I'll move um to also I'll move to
1:52:11 combine the first and third uh as a
1:52:14 resource deployment uh topic and adding
1:52:18 the CTE and then early child education
1:52:20 before afterare as two additional items.
1:52:23 >> Second. The item has been moved by Dr.
1:52:25 Shaw, seconded by Miss Shaw. All those
1:52:27 in favor say I.
1:52:28 >> I. Those opposed. Motion carries.
1:52:31 >> Thank you.
1:52:32 >> Thank you.
1:52:32 >> Congratulations, Mich.
1:52:34 >> Thank you.
1:52:36 >> Pray for me.
1:52:38 >> Pray for us.
1:52:39 >> Next is item 6.2, the adoption of the
1:52:41 TUSD district calendar for school year
1:52:44 2627 and 2728. I can't believe I'm
1:52:49 saying that. So,
1:52:51 >> yeah, I'd like to welcome our calendar
1:52:52 team, Dr. Flora Hwitt, assistant
1:52:54 superintendent, curriculum instruction,
1:52:56 our senior director for curriculum. Um,
1:52:58 and we're here for board consideration
1:53:00 for the school calendar for the next
1:53:02 couple of years. Uh, so I want to turn
1:53:05 it over to our team.
1:53:07 >> Thank you, Dr. Trillo. Good evening,
1:53:08 governing board members. President
1:53:10 Xtram, legal council. It is hard to
1:53:12 think that 2028, my goodness. Oh my
1:53:15 gosh. All right. Right. So, our goal is
1:53:17 to obtain your approval for the 2026 and
1:53:19 2027 and 2728 school years for our
1:53:23 district.
1:53:24 I am going to introduce this item by
1:53:27 discussing that we did have a calendar
1:53:29 committee that met from the months of
1:53:31 October through March this past year and
1:53:35 one of our priorities with that
1:53:36 committee was to ensure that our
1:53:37 calendar aligns with our educational
1:53:39 priorities. Also maximizing our
1:53:42 instructional days was pivotal. As we
1:53:44 discussed the planning for this,
1:53:46 planning for professional development
1:53:47 and accommodating testing schedules as
1:53:50 well as operation schedules and so
1:53:52 forth. We had representation from
1:53:54 families. We had some teachers, school
1:53:56 administrators, financial services,
1:53:58 human resources, curriculum instruction
1:54:01 and operations and transportation. And I
1:54:03 believe Mr. Bel Romero was also part of
1:54:06 a couple of our meetings during our
1:54:08 committee meetings for our calendar to
1:54:12 walk us through the process and the
1:54:13 options. I'm going to invite Miss Heidi
1:54:15 Adanda to talk about the options that we
1:54:17 presented to our families and then some
1:54:19 of the survey results.
1:54:24 >> Thank you.
1:54:25 >> Good evening board members. Um so our
1:54:29 calendar committee really considered
1:54:31 several factors. Um, keeping those goals
1:54:34 in mind that Dr. Hwitt shared, they
1:54:37 considered starting and end dates of
1:54:39 school of the school year, um, breaks
1:54:43 and also professional development. And
1:54:46 so you will see here, these are some of
1:54:48 the options that the committee came up
1:54:51 with based on um, prior feedback. Um we
1:54:56 did have some feedback in the past about
1:54:58 extend
1:55:01 Thanksgiving break and so we tried it we
1:55:04 tried that out. We always do consider
1:55:08 providing the option for the traditional
1:55:10 calendar that people are used to. Um, so
1:55:13 that you'll see in calendar 8, which is
1:55:16 beginning, you know, the first week in
1:55:18 August, having the regular Thanksgiving,
1:55:21 the last day before Memorial Day, and
1:55:23 the four professional learning days, one
1:55:26 each quarter.
1:55:28 The next two examples added that extra
1:55:31 day for Thanksgiving break. So
1:55:33 Thanksgiving break would be Wednesday,
1:55:35 Thursday, and Friday.
1:55:38 Um the difference between B and C is
1:55:42 that um the start dates C ended up was
1:55:46 an early start on August 3rd and um
1:55:50 calendar B had a start date of August
1:55:53 10th.
1:55:55 The last day for calendar B is Memorial
1:55:58 the Thursday before Memorial Day. And um
1:56:03 in calendar C that would end prior a
1:56:07 week prior to Memorial Day.
1:56:10 Both B and C have uh the structure of
1:56:13 two professional learning days before
1:56:15 students um begin the school year.
1:56:19 um but they would be um in the beginning
1:56:22 contract days of teachers and the two
1:56:25 additional PLLD days during the school
1:56:29 year.
1:56:30 We put those calendars and the sample
1:56:33 calendars um together and presented
1:56:36 those to the community through a um
1:56:39 survey and this was the results. We had
1:56:42 over a thousand people um respond to the
1:56:45 survey. You can see it it is a a good
1:56:48 combination of parents and family
1:56:51 members, teachers and staff and
1:56:53 administration as well as students.
1:57:00 Oops, I skipped.
1:57:02 Wow, I skipped a lot. Okay, so um as
1:57:07 their first choice, you can see they
1:57:09 overwhelming overwhelmingly selected
1:57:12 calendar B as their preference.
1:57:15 um and for their first choice as well as
1:57:18 their second choice. So with that in
1:57:21 mind, our recommendation based on their
1:57:25 feedback and input from the community is
1:57:28 that the board um approves calendar B
1:57:31 with a traditional start but extended
1:57:34 Thanksgiving break to be adopted for 26
1:57:37 27 and 2728.
1:57:42 This is what those calendars look like.
1:57:45 and they're also attached in the board
1:57:47 agenda item.
1:57:49 And with that, I will take your
1:57:51 questions.
1:57:53 >> Questions? Dr. Shaw, Miss Shaw, after
1:57:56 Oh, Miss Shaw.
1:57:57 >> Oh, thank you. Um, thanks for your
1:57:59 presentation. One thing I heard about um
1:58:02 this current year is that, you know, we
1:58:05 started on a Monday instead of Thursday.
1:58:07 Was there any uh feedback about how that
1:58:10 was for staff or students?
1:58:15 >> It was a long week.
1:58:16 >> Yeah,
1:58:17 >> as you know, starting on a Monday does
1:58:19 kind of require that shift. Um we did
1:58:22 try to come up with that option with
1:58:25 that extended um Thanksgiving and also
1:58:28 starting the professional learning days
1:58:31 before. It just didn't it didn't work.
1:58:35 But yeah, it does make for a a long
1:58:38 first week of school, I think.
1:58:40 >> Yeah.
1:58:41 Um
1:58:43 Okay. Well, I I like option B because,
1:58:46 you know, it gives us more time to fix
1:58:48 the schools and
1:58:50 >> Yes.
1:58:50 >> I like that Thanksgiving break as well.
1:58:52 So, I I support option B.
1:58:56 >> Dr. Shaw,
1:58:58 >> thank you. A couple of questions. So
1:59:00 with that extension and Thanksgiving,
1:59:01 like if we started on the Thursday
1:59:03 before instead of the Monday, couldn't
1:59:05 we have the whole week of Thanksgiving
1:59:06 off?
1:59:10 >> So one of the things that we um run into
1:59:14 are contract days. So we had to very
1:59:18 creatively even pushing professional
1:59:21 learning days out of the school days and
1:59:23 into the beginning. Um it we had to make
1:59:27 adjustments based on
1:59:30 employee contracts.
1:59:32 So and the instructional minutes of
1:59:35 course um
1:59:39 >> so that number of contract days though,
1:59:41 right? It would be the same number of
1:59:43 contract days. So that would be days off
1:59:45 Monday and Tuesday of Thanksgiving week
1:59:46 and it'll be extra days on Thursday and
1:59:48 Friday before that Monday start.
1:59:51 So starting with teachers the Thursday
1:59:53 prior
1:59:54 >> like we have done in the previous years.
1:59:55 Yeah.
1:59:56 >> So that would extend I think contract
1:59:58 days by two days.
1:59:59 >> Well would have the two extra days of
2:00:01 the week of Thanksgiving off.
2:00:04 >> Right. But I think they're in contract
2:00:06 days even though they are they're like a
2:00:08 paid holiday essentially but still part
2:00:12 of their
2:00:14 contract.
2:00:15 >> Right.
2:00:19 We'd have to explore that with human
2:00:21 resources.
2:00:22 >> And my second question, I know when we
2:00:24 were talking about a lot of the
2:00:25 different um benefit additions that we
2:00:27 negotiated with TEA, a lot of them are
2:00:29 tied to attendance of uh professional
2:00:31 learning days for our teachers and then
2:00:33 we had talked about then moving the
2:00:35 professional learning days to Fridays
2:00:36 because we were less worried about
2:00:38 attendance issues for those. And I see
2:00:40 still see that they're on Wednesdays.
2:00:41 Why didn't we move them to the Fridays
2:00:43 and let the parents at least have the
2:00:45 three-day weekend instead of having to
2:00:46 take a random day off in the middle of
2:00:48 the week?
2:00:51 Well, there's there's no there's no
2:00:53 really um other way to say this, but
2:00:56 when we interface with other districts
2:00:57 and I talk with other districts about
2:00:59 offering professional development on
2:01:01 Fridays and Mondays, we exacerbate
2:01:03 student absenteeism. That goes on in
2:01:05 every system that I've interfaced with
2:01:08 where they're offering these kinds of
2:01:09 days on a Friday or a Monday. Now, that
2:01:11 may not be the case with a lot of the
2:01:13 families watching, but there are notable
2:01:15 spikes. And in a time when we're trying
2:01:18 to talk about mitigating excessive
2:01:20 absenteeism, I would have concerns about
2:01:23 putting these types of days on a Friday
2:01:24 or a Monday. I understand the benefit
2:01:27 for, you know, families, you know, to be
2:01:29 able to to have that extra day and how
2:01:32 that might make child care easier in a
2:01:34 lot of instances, but my fear is I think
2:01:36 it would exacerbate a lot of
2:01:38 absenteeism. I don't worry so much about
2:01:40 staff. Um I do think that, you know, if
2:01:43 we set expectations the right way, I I'm
2:01:46 okay from a staff point of view. Our
2:01:48 staff are professionals. They understand
2:01:50 the importance of professional
2:01:51 development. My concern is for the
2:01:54 39,000 students at large giving a Monday
2:01:57 and giving a Friday like that.
2:01:59 >> Can you can you explain more what you
2:02:00 mean by that? What why would it be more
2:02:01 absentism on a Friday PLLD versus a
2:02:04 Wednesday PL? I think if you have a
2:02:05 Friday PLLD and you're leaving the door
2:02:07 open for students to have that day off,
2:02:10 we're leaving a door open for a 4-day
2:02:11 weekend on Monday and you're leaving the
2:02:14 door open for a potential 4-day week, 4
2:02:16 day weekend on the Thursday before the
2:02:18 Friday that they're off. That to me
2:02:20 would be my my concern versus having it
2:02:23 in the middle of the day or having it on
2:02:25 a Wednesday or even on a Tuesday. you
2:02:27 reduce the temptation to sleep in that
2:02:30 Monday and make it a 4-day weekend or
2:02:33 have families view it as a bridge to a
2:02:35 4-day weekend and make travel plans and
2:02:37 all those other types of things. So,
2:02:38 that would be my my primary concern.
2:02:40 >> Is that like met up in the data in terms
2:02:42 of like do we see a lot more absenteeism
2:02:43 on the Friday before Labor Day or other?
2:02:46 >> Absolutely. Absolutely. And that's
2:02:48 something we can even bring in data from
2:02:49 surrounding school districts. That's not
2:02:51 a phenomenon that's unique to TUSD. Um
2:02:54 that is that actually topic that came up
2:02:56 you know at our attendance conference
2:02:58 that when you look at your own policies
2:03:00 and practices you kind of start with
2:03:02 okay what are we doing that's
2:03:03 potentially exacerbating or creating
2:03:06 absent opportunities for absenteeism. We
2:03:08 have to look when we're scheduling these
2:03:09 types of days. So I just thought I'd
2:03:11 bring that to table. we'd happily bring
2:03:13 data um you know to kind of support that
2:03:15 and talk about that what that looks like
2:03:17 across all of our schools after a labor
2:03:19 day or after you know an MLK day or
2:03:22 before an MLK day what both student
2:03:25 absenteeism looks like and what staff
2:03:26 absenteeism looks like.
2:03:28 >> The other factor to consider is Fridays
2:03:31 have more instructional minutes in them
2:03:33 because they're a regular school day
2:03:36 whereas Wednesdays has a reduced amount
2:03:38 of instructional minutes. Um, and I
2:03:41 think the other piece that we've done to
2:03:43 kind of help those attendance issues is
2:03:45 by pushing those two days before school
2:03:48 starts. It's two less days that we're
2:03:51 interrupting instruction.
2:03:56 >> Mr. Romero.
2:03:58 >> So, um, yeah, and I was on a couple of
2:04:00 those meetings as mentioned. Um, and
2:04:03 kind of as we've gone through this, what
2:04:06 I know now that I didn't know then, um,
2:04:10 kind of comes to to mind over here. And
2:04:14 because of that, I'm looking at calendar
2:04:16 D, which hasn't been discussed here.
2:04:18 here. And I just want to throw this out
2:04:19 there uh just because I know this year
2:04:22 uh with especially our early start. And
2:04:24 I'm sure every uh board member up here
2:04:27 has been getting multiple air
2:04:30 conditioning complaints and outages and
2:04:33 things of that nature that we have at
2:04:35 our school. And I see that we start
2:04:37 early. And from what I understand
2:04:40 through facilities, the cost to have our
2:04:43 schools running in these early August
2:04:46 part of August versus if we started
2:04:49 later and ended later, was there a cost
2:04:53 difference for like keeping our
2:04:56 buildings open if we started a later
2:04:57 date? Is that possible? Are we always
2:05:00 just stuck with these type of days? Um,
2:05:04 you know, again, like I said, we're
2:05:07 still getting AC issues from people, you
2:05:10 know, parents, um, uh, teachers,
2:05:14 principles, etc., etc. And yes, we're
2:05:16 still in September, but if we eliminated
2:05:18 a few other ones in those earlier weeks,
2:05:21 is is that a potential to look at in the
2:05:23 future, or is that even a consideration?
2:05:28 Well, the air conditioning in like May,
2:05:29 June as well. Like if we ended the
2:05:31 school year later into June, that's like
2:05:33 even the hotter time than
2:05:34 >> Well, I from what I understand, August
2:05:36 is a hotter month than than the end of
2:05:38 May and early June if we extended it
2:05:40 over to that area. Yeah, I'm sure
2:05:42 graduations might be a little bit more,
2:05:45 you know, uh diff difficult on that one.
2:05:47 I'm just wondering I like I like B as
2:05:49 far as because we're starting later,
2:05:51 we're getting our facilities more time
2:05:53 to do those things. I I'm just looking
2:05:55 again like I said uh looking outside of
2:05:58 something different. Is it possible to
2:06:00 do a 17th or a little bit later that
2:06:02 third week? Um again I don't you know a
2:06:05 lot of work has been done here and I
2:06:07 don't want to take away from that work.
2:06:08 I just want to open up the door of the
2:06:10 conversation. Is that a possibility? And
2:06:13 if that's a possibility do we have to do
2:06:16 two years in a row? Can we pass this
2:06:18 first year under calendar B and look at
2:06:20 a calendar D as another another option?
2:06:23 Again, I'm throwing things out there. I
2:06:25 don't know again like if Ricky would
2:06:27 have information on those things or any
2:06:28 feedback Dr. Trill would have on those
2:06:31 things. Again, still being new into
2:06:32 this. I'm just looking at other options.
2:06:36 [Music]
2:06:39 >> Oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead. No, I was just
2:06:42 going to say the the most important
2:06:43 thing is instructional days and minutes
2:06:45 and and so forth, but um yeah, I don't
2:06:50 know about the data from facilities
2:06:52 about how many ACs break in, you know,
2:06:55 June or or May,
2:06:58 >> right,
2:06:58 >> compared to August,
2:07:02 >> Miss Ro?
2:07:03 >> Yes, Dr. Trill. So, I would imagine that
2:07:07 if we,
2:07:09 you know, hypothetically looked into Mr.
2:07:12 Romero's suggestion of starting later,
2:07:14 like after a Labor Day, like we used to
2:07:17 do a billion years ago, um, it would
2:07:19 probably
2:07:21 mess up a lot of our like with the AIA.
2:07:25 >> Sure.
2:07:26 >> And all of all of those type of
2:07:27 >> Yeah, we can we certainly look at that.
2:07:29 And, you know, I'm I'm like I'm I was on
2:07:32 calendar E, F, and G. I was trying to
2:07:34 break I was trying to break a bunch of
2:07:35 China. I was challenging them to
2:07:36 innovate and like hey we need to be
2:07:38 thinking like we got to increase
2:07:39 instructional time. We got and they just
2:07:41 weren't having it. So I'm I'm fairly
2:07:44 quiet on this issue. I understand that
2:07:45 we're looking at more traditional
2:07:47 models. But I've always tried to look at
2:07:50 creating a longer runway for operations.
2:07:52 I've said that before. I don't think
2:07:54 that we give them enough time, which is
2:07:56 why we don't finish all of our
2:07:58 preventative maintenance on HVAC and it
2:08:00 comes back and it gets us when we start
2:08:02 so early. You're always going to be
2:08:04 running school in June because you have
2:08:06 summer school. So, that's not going
2:08:08 away. Like that you're you're going to
2:08:09 have to do school in June. The question
2:08:11 is, do you want to go do you want school
2:08:13 to go longer in May so you can forego
2:08:16 August? And that's where you're looking
2:08:18 at where are the temperatures hotter?
2:08:20 Typically, they're hotter in in August
2:08:22 than they are in May. June and July,
2:08:24 June, you're always going to run school.
2:08:25 It's always going to be hot. You got to
2:08:27 deal with summer school wherever it is
2:08:29 that we have it. It's a question of from
2:08:31 a monetary basis, how much are we
2:08:33 spending, you know, and dealing with
2:08:35 with cooling issues in May versus what
2:08:37 we're doing in August. We also have to
2:08:39 look at like AIA calendar, like you
2:08:40 said, Mrs. Luna Rose, like how much does
2:08:43 that set off, you know, fall sports if
2:08:46 we're looking at moving and going a
2:08:48 little bit later in May so that we can
2:08:50 start as close to Labor Day as possible
2:08:51 or even after. So, I think that's kind
2:08:54 of as far as we could probably go with
2:08:56 that because then you get into like
2:08:58 minutes and fall break and, you know, we
2:09:00 still want to honor what the
2:09:01 recommendations were with the
2:09:04 Thanksgiving and all that other kind of
2:09:05 stuff.
2:09:09 >> I do know there is a little bit of a
2:09:11 sense of urgency as um open enrollment
2:09:15 opens in November.
2:09:18 The synergy team needs to build that
2:09:20 system and needs a calendar to plug into
2:09:23 that system. So I know they would prefer
2:09:26 to have an approved calendar at the
2:09:28 latest by end of September, beginning
2:09:30 August.
2:09:31 >> Yeah. And I don't want to kind of
2:09:32 disrupt what you you the work that you
2:09:35 guys have done and and I know you guys
2:09:36 got on a lot of those meetings.
2:09:38 Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get to
2:09:39 all of those. And there was a lot of
2:09:41 collaboration. There was a lot of
2:09:42 conversation, a lot of things happening
2:09:44 in those conversations that I I heard.
2:09:47 You guys did your homework. You did a
2:09:49 lot of these things. But like I had
2:09:50 mentioned just kind of looking at
2:09:52 different things that I'm seeing in a
2:09:53 different view. You know, I'm good with
2:09:55 this with calendar B uh supporting that.
2:09:58 that m maybe for this 26 27 27 28 but
2:10:03 when we revisit this I would like to
2:10:06 maybe have that calendar year D when we
2:10:10 look at it as a at a at a later start
2:10:13 time and having that that later time to
2:10:15 see how that might work with all the
2:10:17 different programs again you guys have
2:10:19 done so much work and I respect that so
2:10:22 I'm not trying to you know take off the
2:10:24 train I just want to look at it from a
2:10:26 different point of view and a
2:10:28 perspective. So
2:10:29 >> I think it's a great time to start
2:10:32 looking at those innovative sort of
2:10:33 solutions. I know Dr. Trujillo just
2:10:35 mentioned he wanted us to explore more
2:10:38 innovative options but um with time
2:10:42 right so looking at 2829
2:10:47 is that the next one? um and starting
2:10:49 that work presenting those ideas to the
2:10:51 community to be able to you know really
2:10:55 explore especially ones that do require
2:10:58 significant change. would be good for to
2:11:00 look at all the systems like Miss Luna
2:11:03 Rose u mentioned about sports and you
2:11:06 know other areas that might be affected
2:11:09 and then maybe because like I said on
2:11:11 the ones that have done you know uh B
2:11:13 was you know number one C and A were
2:11:17 kind of right over similar as far as
2:11:19 that goes but maybe if one of the ones
2:11:22 that didn't work well we eliminate one
2:11:24 of those styles and then but like I said
2:11:26 then D you know now you have four-way
2:11:28 way that it's going to be separated on
2:11:30 out. So, like I said, I'm good with
2:11:32 supporting what we have here today. I
2:11:34 would just like at least be put that out
2:11:37 there that we look at an option D for
2:11:40 the future, but again, I am supportive
2:11:42 of the work you guys have done.
2:11:43 >> Dr. Shaw and then Miss Lenaros.
2:11:45 >> Um, I see that there's a 10-day
2:11:47 discrepancy between first second
2:11:48 semester has always been like that. And
2:11:50 what does that mean in terms of like
2:11:51 classes that are taught in both
2:11:53 semesters having 10 days longer in one
2:11:55 semester compared to the other?
2:11:57 Yeah, it it's all about where the
2:11:59 calendar um lies. This is why we push
2:12:02 those those two days into the spring
2:12:05 semester because that would make our
2:12:07 fall really short. So, we try to
2:12:09 accommodate to to try and even that out.
2:12:13 Um but it it didn't work out to exactly,
2:12:17 you know, half and half semesters.
2:12:21 >> Is that how it's always been? I've
2:12:23 always had a longer second semester than
2:12:24 the first semester last couple of years.
2:12:26 And what does that mean in terms of our
2:12:27 our classes and curriculum and you know
2:12:31 students are taking something one
2:12:32 semester versus another?
2:12:34 >> So we adjust our curriculum um you know
2:12:37 we develop our curriculum in quarters.
2:12:40 So however many days each quarter is um
2:12:44 we adjust our curriculum to fit that and
2:12:46 our pacing guides and and so forth to
2:12:48 give teachers our assessments as well.
2:12:51 Um but we do try to keep it towards that
2:12:56 90 days um each semester more or less
2:12:59 but yeah in
2:13:02 depending on how the calendar falls it's
2:13:05 not always possible.
2:13:06 >> Dr. Trio
2:13:10 >> is it the presence of um the number of
2:13:14 governing board holidays that falls in
2:13:16 one semester versus another that creates
2:13:18 the overage? So, is it is it that
2:13:22 because I think it's a great question. I
2:13:23 think it's important to understand it.
2:13:25 Is it that because we've got the fall
2:13:26 break and the winter break and then
2:13:29 we've got, you know, Labor Day and I
2:13:30 think we've got what's the other one uh
2:13:32 that comes to mind?
2:13:33 >> Veterans Day.
2:13:34 >> Veterans Day.
2:13:36 >> That means that the number of actual
2:13:37 teaching days is reduced and we've got
2:13:40 to make them up in the spring. Is that
2:13:41 what creates that gap? I think it's
2:13:43 important to kind of clarify that.
2:13:45 >> Are we adding days on for that reason?
2:13:47 So we for example we we heard it loud
2:13:51 and clear like we we don't want to start
2:13:53 school in July. That was very clear from
2:13:55 the feedback to the committee. We need
2:13:58 to start as later as late you know late
2:14:00 as possible. So starting August 10th
2:14:03 right there there you're eliminating
2:14:05 five days right right there. Um and so
2:14:08 and like you said there's holidays
2:14:11 within the first semester and then just
2:14:14 where winter break falls. um it it it
2:14:19 can affect that. So, it we try to try
2:14:22 and keep um as close as we can to 90day
2:14:26 semesters, about 45 days a quarter, but
2:14:29 it just doesn't always work that way.
2:14:33 But it we do
2:14:36 we do count backwards. So when we we say
2:14:39 we're going to end um Memorial, you
2:14:42 know, by Memorial Day, then we go back
2:14:45 and and you know, how many we need 176
2:14:48 instructional days. Um we plug in that
2:14:51 fall break, spring break, and try to
2:14:54 even them out as much as possible.
2:14:58 >> Miss Rose, did you have another comment?
2:15:01 >> Um no, I just wanted to say I appreciate
2:15:03 Mr. Romero bringing that up just because
2:15:06 and maybe
2:15:08 um whether I'm on this continuing on
2:15:10 this board or not at that time. I think,
2:15:12 you know, there are parents that I know
2:15:14 that like East Coast and California
2:15:16 schools, you know, they don't start
2:15:18 until the day after Labor Day. And so,
2:15:21 um, I I I think it might be worth
2:15:24 reviewing, um, just because I I
2:15:29 but we're kind of in a situation where
2:15:31 we're always hot. So
2:15:33 >> I don't know what will be with but I I
2:15:35 think it's worth I just want to say I
2:15:37 think it's worth reviewing for for
2:15:39 future dates
2:15:39 >> and giving the opportunity for community
2:15:41 to give feedback.
2:15:45 >> Yeah.
2:15:46 >> I think for tonight's purposes I
2:15:48 probably only feel comfortable approving
2:15:49 the 2627 calendar and keep on working on
2:15:52 kind of seeing how that goes how this
2:15:53 year's goes and everything and and not
2:15:55 approve the the two years. I think what
2:15:57 we need to really do is make sure
2:15:58 everything's ready for the next school
2:15:59 year. I think we've been having
2:16:01 conversations on what makes sense.
2:16:04 >> Mission.
2:16:06 >> Yes, Miss Shaw. Sorry. Um, yeah, I I
2:16:10 agree with Dr. Shaw and just approving
2:16:12 this upcoming calendar. Um, thank you,
2:16:14 Mr. Romero, for bringing that up. I
2:16:16 think it would be great to do that so we
2:16:17 give facilities time to fix our schools
2:16:20 so we don't run into the problem that we
2:16:21 do every school year. Um, but it would
2:16:24 be great to get all the other school
2:16:25 districts on board and extending their
2:16:28 calendar so that we don't um, you know,
2:16:30 put our athletes at risk. And I don't
2:16:33 know who our like board leaison is for
2:16:35 ASBA, but you know, having the whole
2:16:37 state on board to, you know, start later
2:16:40 would be great. um
2:16:42 >> so that we're all on the same page since
2:16:44 this was something that we used to do in
2:16:46 the past, start late, but I don't know
2:16:48 when we started to start early, but uh
2:16:52 yeah, it does create issues in our
2:16:54 district and probably others.
2:16:58 >> And I'll say I I I all the hate emails
2:17:01 can come my way. Um but I would I would
2:17:03 like a year- round calendar, you know,
2:17:05 that's what I would support. I would
2:17:06 like to have I like how Veil does it to
2:17:08 be honest where they have the longer
2:17:09 fall break, the longer spring break,
2:17:12 more breaks built in, less of a long
2:17:14 summertime. Uh I think that's just a lot
2:17:16 of evidence based about learning loss
2:17:18 over the summer. Uh and so that's what I
2:17:20 would push for.
2:17:22 >> Not as a motion tonight, but uh just
2:17:24 want to throw it out there beacon and
2:17:26 let the hate mail come my way.
2:17:27 >> That's the kind of China that I was
2:17:28 trying to get to get them to break. But
2:17:31 >> we did talk about it, but that's
2:17:32 >> along with uniforms. He did that. Get
2:17:34 the uniforms in.
2:17:37 should have added that the BAC.
2:17:39 >> We kind of just brushed over the Monday
2:17:41 start date, so everybody was okay with
2:17:44 that for this year or for this upcoming
2:17:47 school year.
2:17:49 >> Okay.
2:17:50 >> Yeah. Did you want
2:17:51 >> Yeah. I mean, the survey
2:17:54 kind of communicated that now now that
2:17:57 they've lived that, right? We've done
2:17:59 that in the past, but now that they've
2:18:01 relived that again, that might change.
2:18:04 So that might be one of the options
2:18:06 presented again um in the future.
2:18:10 >> Okay.
2:18:10 >> I'm sorry. When was the survey done?
2:18:12 This was done before the school year
2:18:13 started.
2:18:14 >> Yes. So we did present like you can see
2:18:16 the traditional which starts on a
2:18:18 Thursday and then the other two options
2:18:21 that start on a Monday.
2:18:24 But again that could be presented
2:18:27 again a Thursday start date.
2:18:29 >> Yeah. Maybe they wanted
2:18:31 an August 6 start date and then they
2:18:34 wanted an extended Thanksgiving break
2:18:36 and that didn't have the option. So,
2:18:38 because I have heard from parents that
2:18:40 they did hate it. Um,
2:18:43 now my daughter's in the fifth grade and
2:18:45 so I mean it was okay for her, but you
2:18:47 know, for the younger ones, I don't know
2:18:50 um how that affected
2:18:51 >> the Monday start date.
2:18:52 >> Yeah. The Monday start date for kinders
2:18:54 or first graders,
2:18:56 >> right?
2:18:57 >> Yeah. I have a high schooler so she just
2:18:59 complained so it doesn't matter.
2:19:01 >> I'm calling her out.
2:19:03 >> Miss Extram.
2:19:04 >> Yes.
2:19:04 >> I wonder if we can present the calendar
2:19:07 publicly like recommendedation of
2:19:10 calendar B cuz you know oftent times the
2:19:14 survey is just a small I mean it is a
2:19:16 small small portion of people and if
2:19:19 people saw and maybe we explicitly state
2:19:21 that we are going to or we may start
2:19:24 again on a Monday. Please provide your
2:19:26 feedback on this calendar recommendation
2:19:28 and then bring it back at the next board
2:19:30 meeting just so people can know or at
2:19:33 least they can't say like we didn't
2:19:35 know. You know what I mean?
2:19:38 >> Cuz yeah, I got a lot of grief for the
2:19:41 Monday start.
2:19:42 >> I did too. So that's why I'm just
2:19:44 bringing it up. And it may be because
2:19:47 I'm at an elementary school and people
2:19:49 see me and they're like that sucked or
2:19:51 whatever. But um yeah,
2:19:56 >> I'm not sure that would give us a lot.
2:19:57 We have a thousand responses here. I'm
2:19:59 not sure having like five responses is
2:20:00 really going to change too much in terms
2:20:02 of the thousand that we have on here. We
2:20:05 hardly ever we put everything on the
2:20:06 public when we get more than like a
2:20:08 handful of comments on anything,
2:20:10 >> right? But we I mean we put it out
2:20:12 before the first day of school, right?
2:20:14 it closed before school started and so
2:20:17 the ramifications of the Monday start
2:20:19 wasn't realized
2:20:23 and you said November is the time where
2:20:25 you really need it for enrollment.
2:20:28 >> She needs to build it in October. So um
2:20:32 end of September, the latest beginning
2:20:35 of October,
2:20:39 >> Mr. Romero. So going back to that Monday
2:20:42 start date and and I think you know and
2:20:44 I got a little bit but after visiting
2:20:47 some of the schools I don't think it was
2:20:49 as bad as most people thought. I think
2:20:51 it was an initial it's it's something
2:20:54 different than we used to have. So it's
2:20:57 change and I think that was probably one
2:20:58 of the biggest things that I saw on my
2:21:00 end uh talking to some of those people
2:21:02 was the change aspect of it. Um and then
2:21:05 kind of talk, you know, a lot of um
2:21:08 dialogue that we've been happening up
2:21:10 over here. Um which is is great and I am
2:21:13 supportive like said because I know we
2:21:14 have to have something done and in
2:21:17 approving this next year coming on up,
2:21:20 but Dr. Shaw also makes a good point in
2:21:22 option E, you know, um you know, to have
2:21:26 have that out there as a full school
2:21:28 year thing, too. And if if that's
2:21:30 possible, I'd like to make the option at
2:21:31 least to um uh to move this to approve
2:21:37 for next school year 2627
2:21:39 and then come back to look at at least
2:21:42 A, B, C, D, and E.
2:21:46 >> So that's your motion.
2:21:47 >> Yes.
2:21:48 >> Do I hear a second?
2:21:51 >> I'll second it for discussion.
2:21:54 >> Is it too late to add the calendar to
2:21:55 the budget advisory committee?
2:21:57 >> No. No, we already have too many things.
2:22:02 >> I think I'm good with that.
2:22:05 >> Any other
2:22:05 >> approve next year and let's keep on
2:22:07 working on this.
2:22:08 >> Any other discussion,
2:22:10 >> Miss Sean?
2:22:11 >> Gosh, I just I don't It was so difficult
2:22:14 this school year. All right. I wonder if
2:22:17 like we can just table it for until the
2:22:20 next meeting or the meeting after that
2:22:22 so that we can uh float the Thursday uh
2:22:26 start day
2:22:29 so it's not so difficult for for
2:22:32 everybody to to lead up to like have the
2:22:34 full week. It's it's just rough.
2:22:39 >> Yes, Miss Lenoros. I'm going to be the
2:22:41 old fddy duddy here. Um, I was okay with
2:22:44 the Monday star date and I'm still okay
2:22:45 with the Monday star date. Everybody
2:22:47 works Monday through Friday, so
2:22:50 you know, it's the way of the world. Um,
2:22:53 yes, I did get comments, too, but I
2:22:55 think once they got through the week,
2:22:57 they were okay. So, um, I'm okay with
2:23:00 keeping it on Monday.
2:23:02 >> So, calendar A has a Thursday start
2:23:06 date, but then the PLLD days are during
2:23:08 the school year. So, can you can you
2:23:09 explain to me a little bit more about
2:23:10 this contracted days and how this works
2:23:12 and where the limitations are or can
2:23:16 someone explain that to me? Because it
2:23:18 seems like if we started on Thursday,
2:23:20 those two days were pushed into the
2:23:21 school year, which I I probably wouldn't
2:23:23 favor that like just it's really
2:23:24 disruptive had those Wednesdays off for
2:23:27 families. I hear like negative comments
2:23:29 about that a lot from families. Like, I
2:23:31 know another Wednesday off, I got to
2:23:32 figure out what I'm doing with the kids.
2:23:35 So, um,
2:23:38 traditionally the way the employee work
2:23:40 calendar goes, and I don't know if John
2:23:42 is in here, but, um,
2:23:45 people have different traditional start
2:23:48 dates and end dates. So, for example,
2:23:51 teacher assistants. Um, they might
2:23:54 traditionally start on um the first day
2:23:59 of school, right? So when we start a
2:24:03 week earlier than the first day of
2:24:05 school, as in this year started a week
2:24:07 earlier, we had to bring them in prior
2:24:10 to students starting too so that we
2:24:12 wouldn't compromise their their um
2:24:16 contract days. Many of our um work
2:24:20 calendars
2:24:22 had to be adjusted um in order to
2:24:26 accommodate those days prior.
2:24:30 So they have a certain number of work
2:24:33 days. When we took out the PL,
2:24:36 professional learning days out of the
2:24:38 school year, that was two less days
2:24:41 during the year that they had to work.
2:24:44 So we had to add those two contractual
2:24:47 days to the beginning
2:24:50 prior to students coming.
2:24:53 >> So we added two more days to begin the
2:24:55 school year. Couldn't we finish school
2:24:56 year on the Wednesday before Memorial
2:24:58 Day? And that would even it out.
2:25:02 And then
2:25:02 >> we had to add dates to complete their
2:25:04 cont.
2:25:04 >> That would even out the semester a
2:25:06 little bit too.
2:25:10 >> I'm not quite sure I understand that
2:25:12 part.
2:25:13 >> So we we if we did the Thursday start,
2:25:16 kept the PLLD days before the Thursday
2:25:18 start. So we're not adding those two PL
2:25:20 days back into the school year and then
2:25:22 finish the school year a little bit
2:25:23 earlier in May by two days. that would
2:25:25 still have the same contractual days and
2:25:28 still have all the total number of days,
2:25:30 keep the Thursdays start and a little
2:25:32 bit early into the school year. Um, and
2:25:35 even out the semester's a little bit as
2:25:37 well.
2:25:38 >> I I would have to go to the drawing
2:25:40 board. I'm I'm happy to explore that.
2:25:46 >> Miss Shaw,
2:25:46 >> Miss Extram, thank you. Um, I think we I
2:25:50 think we really need to do a Thursday
2:25:52 start date because one, if there's an
2:25:54 issue with the AC, like we have the
2:25:57 weekend, we can fix it or call a
2:26:00 emergency contractor um to get this
2:26:03 fixed. And having it start on Monday,
2:26:06 there's always going to be issues and
2:26:07 it's much more difficult to to address
2:26:09 it in the middle middle of a calendar
2:26:11 week.
2:26:21 Mr. Romero, what was your motion again,
2:26:23 please?
2:26:24 >> So, I was just uh wanting to motion just
2:26:27 to pass this upcoming uh school year um
2:26:30 calendar with the caveat that we bring
2:26:33 this back for the following year to give
2:26:35 at least an option with a basically an
2:26:38 ABCDE,
2:26:40 something with a later start in year and
2:26:42 something with Dr. Shaw had mentioned a
2:26:44 fullear type of schedule.
2:26:46 >> And to address Miss Shaw's concern, they
2:26:49 will be in the school that week, right?
2:26:51 So if something does happen with the AC,
2:26:55 people are in the building,
2:26:57 >> the week before students start. Yes.
2:27:01 >> Yeah.
2:27:02 >> I mean, that could be an, you know, I
2:27:05 don't know.
2:27:06 >> It's not going to help, but I just we
2:27:09 need more time to fix our schools up.
2:27:11 And you see the issues when everybody's
2:27:14 there and the room's 95 degrees.
2:27:16 >> Yeah.
2:27:20 >> So, if we don't pass this tonight, like
2:27:22 what what are we recommending? Like
2:27:24 who's making decisions? Like where where
2:27:25 are we going from here? What are we
2:27:27 recommending that our administrative
2:27:29 team do then?
2:27:30 >> Find a calendar that starts on a
2:27:33 Thursday is what my recommendation would
2:27:35 be.
2:27:36 >> Drill.
2:27:37 >> Dr. Truill.
2:27:38 >> So, we're back here in a week. I don't
2:27:40 think that the tweaks that Dr. I
2:27:43 followed the tweaks. I think they're I I
2:27:45 can walk you through. I mean, I I think
2:27:47 they're reasonable tweaks that we can
2:27:48 make that still balance out the contract
2:27:50 days,
2:27:52 allow us to start on a Thursday, let us
2:27:54 get out a little bit, you know, earlier
2:27:56 for the Memorial Day. We can adjust
2:27:59 those tweaks, be back here in a week and
2:28:01 see what the board's will is. I do think
2:28:03 conceptually I think it's a good thing
2:28:05 to just focus on 2627.
2:28:08 I personally want to see more China
2:28:09 broken before committing to 2728. I want
2:28:13 to really look at, you know, different
2:28:15 challenge the committee to to really
2:28:17 look at research and, you know, what the
2:28:19 increase in frequency to classroom
2:28:22 instruction means, you know, for kids.
2:28:24 So, I I think 2627's on the table. I
2:28:26 don't think it's too much to ask to be
2:28:27 back here in a week. I think the
2:28:29 adjustments that we heard here could be
2:28:31 very very small um to get us to that
2:28:33 Thursday that I think we're we're all
2:28:35 kind of talking about. I do agree that
2:28:37 it it does give us a little bit of that
2:28:39 that extra 48 hour runway when a school
2:28:43 goes down, especially if we're dealing
2:28:45 with a monsoon. The worst thing that
2:28:47 happen is a monsoon over the weekend and
2:28:48 school starts on Monday. That we've been
2:28:51 in that situation before. That's not
2:28:52 fun. Takes the air out. We got people
2:28:55 out there for, you know, 3 4:00 in the
2:28:57 morning trying to get the chillers up.
2:28:59 So, there's a lot of sense in
2:29:00 operationally why we would want to go on
2:29:02 a Thursday. So, I think we can maybe
2:29:04 take a look at that and, you know, see
2:29:05 if we can be back here in a week. I'm
2:29:08 not sure we'd have to convene everybody.
2:29:10 I think we have enough feedback. We're
2:29:12 not changing anything conceptually other
2:29:15 than just maybe moving the start from
2:29:17 Monday to the Thursday and then backing
2:29:20 up a little bit and getting out a little
2:29:21 bit earlier for 26 27.
2:29:24 But do we want to keep calendar B with a
2:29:27 Thursday start and a Wednesday before
2:29:31 Memorial Day out with an extended
2:29:33 Thanksgiving break and then the PLLD is
2:29:36 staying the same
2:29:39 >> if possible.
2:29:40 >> Okay. So
2:29:42 >> the only consequence that I can see is
2:29:44 you push back then
2:29:47 >> um to the third week in July. You push
2:29:50 back new teacher induction
2:29:53 um all of those things. The principal um
2:29:57 welcome back things like that to July
2:30:00 20th
2:30:03 21st.
2:30:04 [Music]
2:30:06 >> I I think we need to look at that
2:30:08 calendar. I don't see where that
2:30:09 happens. I think we're going to have to
2:30:10 walk through that because we're only
2:30:12 talking about a couple of days. Um so I
2:30:14 I think looking at that in a more
2:30:16 detailed way and then we'll be back. But
2:30:19 it is essentially calendar B trying to
2:30:22 get to that Thursday. Um you know with
2:30:24 regard to the PLLD days taking two of
2:30:26 them out taking two of them out of the
2:30:28 academic year I think is eases like the
2:30:31 child care burden. Um so I think we're
2:30:33 almost there but we'll we'll sit down
2:30:35 and I I want to see where that takes us
2:30:38 back into July. come back.
2:30:42 >> Let's just vote it down. Okay. So, in
2:30:45 order for them to come back, there's a
2:30:47 motion and a second on the table um to
2:30:50 approve the calendar as presented
2:30:52 tonight. So, if you want them to come
2:30:55 back, you vote it down.
2:30:57 >> So, can I retract that or do we just
2:30:59 vote it down? You have to second it. So,
2:31:01 it's not yours as a board's motion now.
2:31:03 >> So, um all those Let's do a roll call
2:31:06 vote.
2:31:10 Dr. Robbie,
2:31:11 >> no.
2:31:12 >> Miss Luna Rose,
2:31:13 >> yes.
2:31:14 >> Miss Shaw,
2:31:15 >> no.
2:31:16 >> Mr. Rometo,
2:31:17 >> no.
2:31:17 >> Miss Extra,
2:31:18 >> no. Motion fails.
2:31:22 Um, so you'll be back next week. Thank
2:31:25 you so much.
2:31:26 >> Say, real quick, I encourage the
2:31:27 audience, um, you know, after this is
2:31:29 gets posted on Friday to take a look at
2:31:31 it. Um,
2:31:33 hopefully we can pass something next
2:31:35 week, but we would love the feedback. I
2:31:36 think if you send us emails or um yeah,
2:31:40 just send us emails and let us know what
2:31:41 you think.
2:31:44 >> Next item is future meeting dates and
2:31:46 agenda items. Dr.
2:31:49 Uh we will be back uh with a counter
2:31:51 next week um and then our lobbyists will
2:31:54 be in town um to give you their
2:31:57 legislative wrap-up and then get the
2:31:59 board discussing what it might look at
2:32:02 for some uh legislative priorities to
2:32:04 focus on for the upcoming session.
2:32:07 >> Um anything else for uh from the
2:32:09 governing board members? If not, the
2:32:11 meeting stands adjourned. Thank you.